mirror of
https://github.com/adulau/aha.git
synced 2024-12-27 19:26:25 +00:00
29671f22a8
rwsem_is_locked() tests ->activity without locks, so we should always keep ->activity consistent. However, the code in __rwsem_do_wake() breaks this rule, it updates ->activity after _all_ readers waken up, this may give some reader a wrong ->activity value, thus cause rwsem_is_locked() behaves wrong. Quote from Andrew: " - we have one or more processes sleeping in down_read(), waiting for access. - we wake one or more processes up without altering ->activity - they start to run and they do rwsem_is_locked(). This incorrectly returns "false", because the waker process is still crunching away in __rwsem_do_wake(). - the waker now alters ->activity, but it was too late. " So we need get a spinlock to protect this. And rwsem_is_locked() should not block, thus we use spin_trylock_irqsave(). [akpm@linux-foundation.org: simplify code] Reported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Cc: Ben Woodard <bwoodard@llnl.gov> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <amwang@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
acpi | ||
asm-generic | ||
crypto | ||
drm | ||
keys | ||
linux | ||
math-emu | ||
media | ||
mtd | ||
net | ||
pcmcia | ||
rdma | ||
rxrpc | ||
scsi | ||
sound | ||
trace | ||
video | ||
xen | ||
Kbuild |