Updated version

This commit is contained in:
Alexandre Dulaunoy 2017-09-27 16:04:21 +02:00
parent c93eea4be5
commit ac45447ddf
Signed by: adulau
GPG key ID: 09E2CD4944E6CBCD
3 changed files with 42 additions and 42 deletions

View file

@ -428,7 +428,7 @@
<h1 id="rfc.abstract"> <h1 id="rfc.abstract">
<a href="#rfc.abstract">Abstract</a> <a href="#rfc.abstract">Abstract</a>
</h1> </h1>
<p>This document describes the Programming Methodology Framework also known under the PMF methodology. The methodology is based on the manifesto written by Zed A. Shaw <a href="#PROGRAMMING-MF-MANIFESTO">[PROGRAMMING-MF-MANIFESTO]</a> which describes a natural approach to software engineering especially on the strong focus towards the act of programming. The PM methodology uses a soft naming to allow a non-partisan reference into official engineering or project documents to describe one of the most used software engineering methodology. </p> <p>This document describes the Programming Methodology Framework also known under the PMF methodology. The methodology is based on the manifesto written by Zed A. Shaw <a href="#PROGRAMMING-MF-MANIFESTO">[PROGRAMMING-MF-MANIFESTO]</a> which describes a natural approach to software engineering with a strong focus on the act of programming. The PM methodology uses a soft naming to allow for a non-partisan reference to official engineering or project documents describing one of the most used software engineering methodologies. </p>
<h1 id="rfc.status"> <h1 id="rfc.status">
<a href="#rfc.status">Status of This Memo</a> <a href="#rfc.status">Status of This Memo</a>
</h1> </h1>
@ -464,25 +464,25 @@
<p id="rfc.section.1.p.1">In 2011, Zed A. Shaw published a blog post which describes: </p> <p id="rfc.section.1.p.1">In 2011, Zed A. Shaw published a blog post which describes: </p>
<p id="rfc.section.1.p.2">I think I'm going to create the ultimate software development methodology. It'll be revolutionary compared to others because it will focus on the one thing that gets software done. Its entire focus will be this one, glorious, completely useful activity for writing software. It's name even embodies the perfection of this programming methodology. </p> <p id="rfc.section.1.p.2">I think I'm going to create the ultimate software development methodology. It'll be revolutionary compared to others because it will focus on the one thing that gets software done. Its entire focus will be this one, glorious, completely useful activity for writing software. It's name even embodies the perfection of this programming methodology. </p>
<p id="rfc.section.1.p.3">The programming methodology was published as a manifesto later <a href="#PROGRAMMING-MF-MANIFESTO">[PROGRAMMING-MF-MANIFESTO]</a>. The manifesto clearly describes the focus on programming to avoid the surrounding management overhead and pivot towards the delivery of the software. The <a href="#THE-TAO-OF-PROGRAMMING">[THE-TAO-OF-PROGRAMMING]</a> describes similar methodologies which strongly focus on coding, scripting and programming. </p> <p id="rfc.section.1.p.3">The programming methodology was published as a manifesto later <a href="#PROGRAMMING-MF-MANIFESTO">[PROGRAMMING-MF-MANIFESTO]</a>. The manifesto clearly describes the focus on programming to avoid the surrounding management overhead and pivot towards the delivery of the software. The <a href="#THE-TAO-OF-PROGRAMMING">[THE-TAO-OF-PROGRAMMING]</a> describes similar methodologies which strongly focus on coding, scripting and programming. </p>
<p id="rfc.section.1.p.4">The overall concept of PMF methodology follows this iteration: </p> <p id="rfc.section.1.p.4">The overall concept of PMF methodology follows the following process: </p>
<p/> <p/>
<ul> <ul>
<li>Write a list of things to be done and use an iterative programming process.</li> <li>Compose a list of features to be implemented and use an iterative programming process.</li>
<li>Do some of the things with additional programming.</li> <li>Enhance said features using trial and error programming.</li>
<li>Build testing and tests using programming.</li> <li>Orchestrate your testing and integration processes using pragmatic programming.</li>
</ul> </ul>
<p> </p> <p> </p>
<p id="rfc.section.1.p.6">This process is run in a while loop until the software is delivered. </p> <p id="rfc.section.1.p.6">Repeat the above process until the software is delivered. </p>
<h1 id="rfc.section.1.1"><a href="#rfc.section.1.1">1.1.</a> <a href="#management-and-pmf-methodology" id="management-and-pmf-methodology">Management and PMF methodology</a></h1> <h1 id="rfc.section.1.1"><a href="#rfc.section.1.1">1.1.</a> <a href="#management-and-pmf-methodology" id="management-and-pmf-methodology">Management and PMF methodology</a></h1>
<p id="rfc.section.1.1.p.1">A simple management process is required in addition to the PMF methodology. The management process is complementary to the PMF metholody and not interfering with the programming aspect. The management process is there to support the PMF methodology. </p> <p id="rfc.section.1.1.p.1">A simple management process is a required of the PMF methodology. The management process is meant to be complementary instead of interfering with the programming aspect and solely serves to support the PMF methodology. </p>
<p/> <p/>
<ul> <ul>
<li>Review requirements of the users/customers by asking them.</li> <li>Collect requirements of the users/customers.</li>
<li>Give the list of things to be done to the programmers.</li> <li>Provide programmers with the desired requirements.</li>
<li>Review the delivered software to see if it matches the requirements.</li> <li>Review whether the software to be delivered matches the requirements.</li>
</ul> </ul>
<p> </p> <p> </p>

View file

@ -16,11 +16,11 @@ Abstract
This document describes the Programming Methodology Framework also This document describes the Programming Methodology Framework also
known under the PMF methodology. The methodology is based on the known under the PMF methodology. The methodology is based on the
manifesto written by Zed A. Shaw [PROGRAMMING-MF-MANIFESTO] which manifesto written by Zed A. Shaw [PROGRAMMING-MF-MANIFESTO] which
describes a natural approach to software engineering especially on describes a natural approach to software engineering with a strong
the strong focus towards the act of programming. The PM methodology focus on the act of programming. The PM methodology uses a soft
uses a soft naming to allow a non-partisan reference into official naming to allow for a non-partisan reference to official engineering
engineering or project documents to describe one of the most used or project documents describing one of the most used software
software engineering methodology. engineering methodologies.
Status of This Memo Status of This Memo
@ -92,17 +92,17 @@ Table of Contents
[THE-TAO-OF-PROGRAMMING] describes similar methodologies which [THE-TAO-OF-PROGRAMMING] describes similar methodologies which
strongly focus on coding, scripting and programming. strongly focus on coding, scripting and programming.
The overall concept of PMF methodology follows this iteration: The overall concept of PMF methodology follows the following process:
o Write a list of things to be done and use an iterative programming o Compose a list of features to be implemented and use an iterative
process. programming process.
o Do some of the things with additional programming. o Enhance said features using trial and error programming.
o Build testing and tests using programming. o Orchestrate your testing and integration processes using pragmatic
programming.
This process is run in a while loop until the software is delivered.
Repeat the above process until the software is delivered.
@ -116,16 +116,16 @@ Internet-Draft PMF - Programming Methodology Framework September 2017
1.1. Management and PMF methodology 1.1. Management and PMF methodology
A simple management process is required in addition to the PMF A simple management process is a required of the PMF methodology.
methodology. The management process is complementary to the PMF The management process is meant to be complementary instead of
metholody and not interfering with the programming aspect. The interfering with the programming aspect and solely serves to support
management process is there to support the PMF methodology. the PMF methodology.
o Review requirements of the users/customers by asking them. o Collect requirements of the users/customers.
o Give the list of things to be done to the programmers. o Provide programmers with the desired requirements.
o Review the delivered software to see if it matches the o Review whether the software to be delivered matches the
requirements. requirements.
1.2. Conventions and Terminology 1.2. Conventions and Terminology

View file

@ -50,8 +50,8 @@
<abstract> <abstract>
<t>This document describes the Programming Methodology Framework also known under the PMF methodology. The methodology is based on the manifesto written by Zed A. Shaw <xref target="PROGRAMMING-MF-MANIFESTO"/> which <t>This document describes the Programming Methodology Framework also known under the PMF methodology. The methodology is based on the manifesto written by Zed A. Shaw <xref target="PROGRAMMING-MF-MANIFESTO"/> which
describes a natural approach to software engineering especially on the strong focus towards the act of programming. The PM methodology uses a soft naming to allow a non-partisan reference describes a natural approach to software engineering with a strong focus on the act of programming. The PM methodology uses a soft naming to allow for a non-partisan reference
into official engineering or project documents to describe one of the most used software engineering methodology. to official engineering or project documents describing one of the most used software engineering methodologies.
</t> </t>
</abstract> </abstract>
@ -67,28 +67,28 @@ into official engineering or project documents to describe one of the most used
</t> </t>
<t>The programming methodology was published as a manifesto later <xref target="PROGRAMMING-MF-MANIFESTO"/>. The manifesto clearly describes the focus on programming to avoid the surrounding management overhead and pivot towards the delivery of the software. The <xref target="THE-TAO-OF-PROGRAMMING"/> describes similar methodologies which strongly focus on coding, scripting and programming. <t>The programming methodology was published as a manifesto later <xref target="PROGRAMMING-MF-MANIFESTO"/>. The manifesto clearly describes the focus on programming to avoid the surrounding management overhead and pivot towards the delivery of the software. The <xref target="THE-TAO-OF-PROGRAMMING"/> describes similar methodologies which strongly focus on coding, scripting and programming.
</t> </t>
<t>The overall concept of PMF methodology follows this iteration: <t>The overall concept of PMF methodology follows the following process:
</t> </t>
<t> <t>
<list style="symbols"> <list style="symbols">
<t>Write a list of things to be done and use an iterative programming process.</t> <t>Compose a list of features to be implemented and use an iterative programming process.</t>
<t>Do some of the things with additional programming.</t> <t>Enhance said features using trial and error programming.</t>
<t>Build testing and tests using programming.</t> <t>Orchestrate your testing and integration processes using pragmatic programming.</t>
</list> </list>
</t> </t>
<t>This process is run in a while loop until the software is delivered. <t>Repeat the above process until the software is delivered.
</t> </t>
<section anchor="management-and-pmf-methodology" title="Management and PMF methodology"> <section anchor="management-and-pmf-methodology" title="Management and PMF methodology">
<t>A simple management process is required in addition to the PMF methodology. <t>A simple management process is a required of the PMF methodology.
The management process is complementary to the PMF metholody and not interfering with The management process is meant to be complementary instead of interfering with
the programming aspect. The management process is there to support the PMF methodology. the programming aspect and solely serves to support the PMF methodology.
</t> </t>
<t> <t>
<list style="symbols"> <list style="symbols">
<t>Review requirements of the users/customers by asking them.</t> <t>Collect requirements of the users/customers.</t>
<t>Give the list of things to be done to the programmers.</t> <t>Provide programmers with the desired requirements.</t>
<t>Review the delivered software to see if it matches the requirements.</t> <t>Review whether the software to be delivered matches the requirements.</t>
</list> </list>
</t> </t>
</section> </section>