From b0a22b3a5da43e356d291ce0939062b19fc608ec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alexandre Dulaunoy Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 21:22:07 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Typo fixed --- posts/what-kind-of-photography.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/posts/what-kind-of-photography.rst b/posts/what-kind-of-photography.rst index ef0aa0b..472cd06 100644 --- a/posts/what-kind-of-photography.rst +++ b/posts/what-kind-of-photography.rst @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ embraces freedom, the acceptance of unconventional artistic perspective and open There are many photo groups on Internet and I decided to upload a photography to a group called street photography. Then something happened, the picture was rejected. Reading the rules, it seems that the definition of street photography -is more than strict than expected. Then I decided to wander around various photography groups which are classified as *street photography*. +is more strict than expected. Then I decided to wander around various photography groups which are classified as *street photography*. What I have seen in these groups with strict rules? A continuous stream of the same thing, a street, some people and that's it. So there is at least: two kind of definition of street photography. The one which is only a matter of inventory. But the most