.. description: A trace in photography is the witness to an anteriority. We, as photographer, take each opportunity to capture moments who evaporate from our own life.
Again a small and side comment during a walk disturbed me. *It's raining so it's a pity for you doing photography*. This posed a question to myself regarding the precondition
of taking pictures. Why restricting yourself to some positive conditions in order to take photographies? Especially when you witness a trace, it's an evidence of your own life.
Retouching, by restricting yourself to good setup while doing photography (e.g. sunny weather, perfect lighting or framing), is loosing a part of the truth inherent to the
trace you want to capture. The picture surface_ was taken during this rainy walk. The situation (circular effect of the droplets) allows to set the trace in a timeline by
witnessing the rain. A photography is not more readable if you have perfect surroundings or condition but when partial or disturbing elements are there to stress the witnesses.
I will continue to take my camera with me even if the conditions are far from being perfect. My perception of the traces is strongly linked to my capacity to keep the anteriority
alive.
If you would like to dig more in the trace topic, the book *Photography, Trace, and Trauma* by Margaret Iversen (ref_) is maybe one of the most sensitive work, I read, on the topic even if I personaly think the Trauma