adulau/pdns-qof
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/adulau/pdns-qof.git synced 2024-11-22 01:57:07 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

fixed ABNF, updated TODO.md

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Aaron Kaplan 2014-02-27 14:45:32 +01:00
parent 5857df0e32
commit 94e89223b5
2 changed files with 20 additions and 11 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

17
TODO.md
View file

@ -2,17 +2,18 @@
TODO
=====
* <del>get an updated address of Henry </del> DONE
* formal grammar (ABNF) for the output format
* DONE <del>get an updated address of Henry </del>
* DONE formal grammar (ABNF) for the output format
* create query API RFC
* move samples to a separate section - DONE (two samples added in appendix)
* cross check out work with http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-bortzmeyer-dnsop-dns-privacy-01.txt - DONE
* Submit to IETF editor DONE
* Submit to dns-op IETF WG (after first publication via RFC editor) DONE
* DONE move samples to a separate section - DONE (two samples added in appendix)
* DONE cross check out work with http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-bortzmeyer-dnsop-dns-privacy-01.txt
* DONE Submit to IETF editor
* DONE Submit to dns-op IETF WG (after first publication via RFC editor)
* Import master file - how does this work from a passive DNS point of view? -> Paul?
* More examples to add - to explain JSON escaping multi resource records and so on on (adulau)
* ABNF grammar (aaron)
* Check with aaron if sensor_id new definition matches the implementation in Austria
* DONE <del>ABNF grammar (aaron)</del>
* DONE <del>Check with aaron if sensor\_id new definition matches the implementation in Austria</del> Yes
* Submit -02 to IETF editor
* Submit -03 to IETF editor

14
i-d/pdns-qof.xml
View file

@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ The document does not describe the protocol (e.g. <xref target="RFC3912">WHOIS</
</section>
<section title="Common Output Format">
<section title="Overview">
<t>The formatting of the answer follows the <xref target="RFC4627">JSON</xref> format. The order of the fields is not significant for the same resource type. </t>
<t>The formatting of the answer follows the <xref target="RFC4627">JSON</xref> format. In fact, it is a subset of the full JSON language. Notable differences are the modified definition of whitespace ("ws"). The order of the fields is not significant for the same resource type. </t>
<t>The intent of this output format is to be easily parsable by scripts. Each JSON object is expressed on a single line to be processed by the client line-by-line. Every implementation MUST support the JSON output format.</t> <!-- note: it is "parsable" if you want to be really nit-picking. See: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/parsable -->
<t><xref target="app-additional">Examples of JSON</xref> output are in the appendix.</t>
</section>
@ -180,14 +180,21 @@ answer = entries
entries = * ( entry CR)
entry = "{" keyvallist "}"
keyvallist = [ member *( value-separator member ) ]
member = field name-separator value
name-separator = ws %x3A ws ; : colon
member = qm field qm name-separator value
name-separator = ws %x3A ws ; a ":" colon
value = value ; as defined in the JSON RFC
value-separator = ws %x2C ws ; , comma. As defined in JSON
field = "rrname" | "rrtype" | "rdata" | "time_first" |
"time_last" | "count" | "bailiwick" | "sensor_id" |
"zone_time_first" | "zone_time_last" | futureField
futureField = string
CR = %x0D
qm = %x22 ; " a quotation mark
ws = *(
%x20 | ; Space
%x09 ; Horizontal tab
)
]]></artwork></figure>
<t>Note that value is defined in <xref target="RFC4627">JSON</xref> and has the exact same specification as there. The same goes for the definition of string.</t>
</section>
@ -403,6 +410,7 @@ CR = %x0D
"time_last": 1330209752}
]]>
</artwork></figure>
<t>Please note that in the examples above, any backslashes "\" can be ignored and are an artefact of the tools which produced this document.</t>
</section>
</back>