2013-12-25 15:57:32 +00:00
|
|
|
old: https://dnsdb-api.isc.org
|
|
|
|
|
new: https://api.dnsdb.info
|
2013-10-22 17:16:14 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2013-12-25 15:57:32 +00:00
|
|
|
[X] keep output format and query format separated in two different documents
|
|
|
|
|
[X] we should not specify which rtypes MUST be supported. It is only an output format spec
|
|
|
|
|
[X] rrtype should be mnemonic that is supported by IANA
|
|
|
|
|
[X] rfc 3597 unknown record type -> reference this rfc for arbitrary rrtypes
|
|
|
|
|
[X] same as for RDATA (if it can not format it correctly, it should be formated as in rfc3597
|
2013-10-22 17:16:14 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2013-12-25 15:57:32 +00:00
|
|
|
[x] optional: x-more-data-coming: 50 (for Cisco) --> nope... Cisco has a different (pre-recursor ) system. Not part of this draft.
|
2013-10-22 17:16:14 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-12-25 15:57:32 +00:00
|
|
|
[ ] we define the record format, any extensions should be specified in an RFC describing how the protocol works
|
|
|
|
|
[ ] --> specify the control packets in a separate RFC
|
|
|
|
|
[ ] --> Paul will ask Robert.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion about Cisco's "more data coming" extension:
|
2013-10-22 17:16:14 +00:00
|
|
|
fearful of breaking existing programs by adding a bookend
|
|
|
|
|
Idea: if you can add &show_progress=1 to ReST GET request, then we can add the fields
|
|
|
|
|
If a given implementation supports bookends, progress bars, then these have to be optional and they should be signalled via HTTP GET ¶meter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extension to the record format must be x-* (for exaple x-query-id)
|
2013-12-25 16:03:21 +00:00
|
|
|
--> we decided against that because of http://tools.ietf.org/search/rfc6648
|
|
|
|
|
Instead we created a registry in the github wiki
|
2013-10-22 17:16:14 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2013-12-25 15:57:32 +00:00
|
|
|
[ ] Samples are OK! But move them to a separate section!
|
2013-10-22 17:16:14 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dnstap -> get mail from paul
|
2013-12-25 16:03:21 +00:00
|
|
|
in google protocol bufs
|
|
|
|
|
will tap any part of a nameserver (code).
|
2013-10-22 17:16:14 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
next steps:
|
|
|
|
|
* private circulation with robert edmonds, bfk, auckland, cert.ee
|
2013-12-25 16:03:21 +00:00
|
|
|
* virustotal (?) -> later
|
2013-10-22 17:16:14 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
submission:
|
2013-12-25 15:57:32 +00:00
|
|
|
[ ] the dns-op still exists! So pdns-qof should be submitted to dns-op
|
2013-10-22 17:16:14 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
