mirror of
https://github.com/adulau/aha.git
synced 2024-12-28 11:46:19 +00:00
47420c7998
Pekka Enberg pointed out that double error handlings found after nilfs_transaction_end() can be avoided by separating abort operation: OK, I don't understand this. The only way nilfs_transaction_end() can fail is if we have NILFS_TI_SYNC set and we fail to construct the segment. But why do we want to construct a segment if we don't commit? I guess what I'm asking is why don't we have a separate nilfs_transaction_abort() function that can't fail for the erroneous case to avoid this double error value tracking thing? This does the separation and renames nilfs_transaction_end() to nilfs_transaction_commit() for clarification. Since, some calls of these functions were used just for exclusion control against the segment constructor, they are replaced with semaphore operations. Acked-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| alloc.c | ||
| alloc.h | ||
| bmap.c | ||
| bmap.h | ||
| bmap_union.h | ||
| btnode.c | ||
| btnode.h | ||
| btree.c | ||
| btree.h | ||
| cpfile.c | ||
| cpfile.h | ||
| dat.c | ||
| dat.h | ||
| dir.c | ||
| direct.c | ||
| direct.h | ||
| file.c | ||
| gcdat.c | ||
| gcinode.c | ||
| ifile.c | ||
| ifile.h | ||
| inode.c | ||
| ioctl.c | ||
| Makefile | ||
| mdt.c | ||
| mdt.h | ||
| namei.c | ||
| nilfs.h | ||
| page.c | ||
| page.h | ||
| recovery.c | ||
| sb.h | ||
| segbuf.c | ||
| segbuf.h | ||
| seglist.h | ||
| segment.c | ||
| segment.h | ||
| sufile.c | ||
| sufile.h | ||
| super.c | ||
| the_nilfs.c | ||
| the_nilfs.h | ||