We used to perform 2 routing lookups for a new transport: one
just for path mtu detection, and one to actually route to destination
and path mtu update when sending a packet. There is no point in doing
both of them, especially since the first one just for path mtu doesn't
take into account source address and sometimes gives the wrong route,
causing path mtu updates anyway.
We now do just the one call to do both route to destination and get
path mtu updates.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
We currently track if AUTH has been bundled using the 'auth'
pointer to the chunk. However, AUTH is disallowed after DATA
is already in the packet, so we need to instead use the
'has_auth' field.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
The packet information does not reset after packet transmit, this
may cause some problems such as following DATA chunk be sent without
AUTH chunk, even if the authentication of DATA chunk has been
requested by the peer.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Add-IP feature allows users to delete an active transport. If that
transport has chunks in flight, those chunks need to be moved to another
transport or association may get into unrecoverable state.
Reported-by: Rafael Laufer <rlaufer@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
We had a bug that we never stored the user-defined value for
MAXSEG when setting the value on an association. Thus future
PMTU events ended up re-writing the frag point and increasing
it past user limit. Additionally, when setting the option on
the socket/endpoint, we effect all current associations, which
is against spec.
Now, we store the user 'maxseg' value along with the computed
'frag_point'. We inherit 'maxseg' from the socket at association
creation and use it as an upper limit for 'frag_point' when its
set.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
SCTP will delay the last part of a large write due to NAGLE, if that
part is smaller then MTU. Since we are doing large writes, we might
as well send the last portion now instead of waiting untill the next
large write happens. The small portion will be sent as is regardless,
so it's better to not delay it.
This is a result of much discussions with Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
and Doug Graham <dgraham@nortel.com>. Many thanks go out to them.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
The decision to delay due to Nagle should be based on the path mtu
and future packet size. We currently incorrectly base it on
'frag_point' which is the SCTP DATA segment size, and also we do
not count DATA chunk header overhead in the computation. This
actuall allows situations where a user can set low 'frag_point',
and then send small messages without delay.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
We currently set a_rwnd to 0 when faking a SACK from SHUTDOWN.
This results in an hung association if the remote only uses
SHUTDOWNs (which it's allowed to do) to acknowlege DATA when
closing. The reason for that is that we simply honor the a_rwnd
from the sack, but since we faked it to be 0, we enter 0-window
probing. The fix is to use the peers old rwnd and add our flight
size to it.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
SCTP has a problem that when small chunks are used, it is possible
to exhaust the receiver buffer without fully closing receive window.
This happens due to all overhead that we have account for with small
messages. To fix this, when receive buffer is exceeded, we'll drop
the window to 0 and save the 'drop' portion. When application starts
reading data and freeing up recevie buffer space, we'll wait until
we've reached the 'drop' window and then add back this 'drop' one
mtu at a time. This worked well in testing and under stress produced
rather even recovery.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
If T3 timer expires, we are retransmitting data due to timeout any
any fast recovery is null and void. We can clear the fast recovery
flag.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
SCTP RFC 4960 states that unacknowledged HEARTBEATS count as
errors agains a given transport or endpoint. As such, we
should increment the error counts for only for unacknowledged
HB, otherwise we detect failure too soon. This goes for both
the overall error count and the path error count.
Now, there is a difference in how the detection is done
between the two. The path error detection is done after
the increment, so to detect it properly, we actually need
to exceed the path threshold. The overall error detection
is done _BEFORE_ the increment. Thus to detect the failure,
it's enough for the error count to match the threshold.
This is why all the state functions use '>=' to detect failure,
while path detection uses '>'.
Thanks goes to Chunbo Luo <chunbo.luo@windriver.com> who first
proposed patches to fix this issue and made me re-read the spec
and the code to figure out how this cruft really works.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
The receiver of the HEARTBEAT should respond with a HEARTBEAT ACK
that contains the Heartbeat Information field copied from the
received HEARTBEAT chunk. So the received HEARTBEAT-ACK chunk
must have a length of:
sizeof(sctp_chunkhdr_t) + sizeof(sctp_sender_hb_info_t)
A badly formatted HB-ACK chunk, it is possible that we may access
invalid memory. We should really make sure that the chunk format
is what we expect, before attempting to touch the data.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
If Cumulative TSN Ack field of SHUTDOWN chunk is less than the
Cumulative TSN Ack Point then drop the SHUTDOWN chunk.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Currenlty, sctp breaks up user messages into fragments and
sends each fragment to the lower layer by itself. This means
that for each fragment we go all the way down the stack
and back up. This also discourages bundling of multiple
fragments when they can fit into a sigle packet (ex: due
to user setting a low fragmentation threashold).
We introduce a new command SCTP_CMD_SND_MSG and hand the
whole message down state machine. The state machine and
the side-effect parser will cork the queue, add all chunks
from the message to the queue, and then un-cork the queue
thus causing the chunks to get transmitted.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
If the association has a SACK timer pending and now DATA queued
to be send, we'll try to bundle the SACK with the next application send.
As such, try encourage bundling by accounting for SACK in the size
of the first chunk fragment.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
We are now trying to bundle SACKs when we have outbound
DATA to send. However, there are situations where this
outbound DATA will not be sent (due to congestion or
available window). In such cases it's ok to wait for the
timer to expire. This patch refactors the sending code
so that betfore attempting to bundle the SACK we check
to see if the DATA will actually be transmitted.
Based on eirlier works for Doug Graham <dgraham@nortel.com> and
Wei Youngjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Since an application may specify the maximum SCTP fragment size
that all data should be fragmented to, we need to fix how
we do segmentation. Right now, if a user specifies a small
fragment size, the segment size can go negative in the presence
of AUTH or COOKIE_ECHO bundling.
What we need to do is track the largest possbile DATA chunk that
can fit into the mtu. Then if the fragment size specified is
bigger then this maximum length, we'll shrink it down. Otherwise,
we just use the smaller segment size without changing it further.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
If a socket has a lot of association that are in the process of
of being closed/aborted, it is possible for a remote to establish
new associations during the time period that the old ones are shutting
down. If this was a result of a close() call, there will be no socket
and will cause a memory leak. We'll prevent this by setting the
socket state to CLOSING and disallow new associations when in this state.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
This patch corrects the conditions under which a SACK will be piggybacked
on a DATA packet. The previous condition was incorrect due to a
misinterpretation of RFC 4960 and/or RFC 2960. Specifically, the
following paragraph from section 6.2 had not been implemented correctly:
Before an endpoint transmits a DATA chunk, if any received DATA
chunks have not been acknowledged (e.g., due to delayed ack), the
sender should create a SACK and bundle it with the outbound DATA
chunk, as long as the size of the final SCTP packet does not exceed
the current MTU. See Section 6.2.
When about to send a DATA chunk, the code now checks to see if the SACK
timer is running. If it is, we know we have a SACK to send to the
peer, so we append the SACK (assuming available space in the packet)
and turn off the timer. For a simple request-response scenario, this
will result in the SACK being bundled with the response, meaning the
the SACK is received quickly by the client, and also meaning that no
separate SACK packet needs to be sent by the server to acknowledge the
request. Prior to this patch, a separate SACK packet would have been
sent by the server SCTP only after its delayed-ACK timer had expired
(usually 200ms). This is wasteful of bandwidth, and can also have a
major negative impact on performance due the interaction of delayed ACKs
with the Nagle algorithm.
Signed-off-by: Doug Graham <dgraham@nortel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
When the sctp transport is marked down, we can release the
cached route and force a new lookup when attempting to use
this transport for anything. This way, if a better route
or source address is available, we'll try to use it.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Update the route and saddr entries for the non-active transports as some
of the added addresses can be used as better source addresses, or may
be there is a better route.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
This patch fix to check the unrecognized ASCONF parameter before
access it.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
The return value of sctp_process_asconf_ack() may be
overwritten while process parameters with no error.
This patch fixed the problem.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
String literals are constant, and usually, we can also tag the array
of pointers const too, moving it to the .rodata section.
Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Commit 'net: skb->dst accessors'(adf30907d6)
broken the sctp protocol stack, the sctp packet can never be sent out after
Eric Dumazet's patch, which have typo in the sctp code.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladisalv.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Change all the code that deals directly with ICMPv6 type and code
values to use u8 instead of a signed int as that's the actual data
type.
Signed-off-by: Brian Haley <brian.haley@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
commit 2b85a34e91
(net: No more expensive sock_hold()/sock_put() on each tx)
changed initial sk_wmem_alloc value.
We need to take into account this offset when reporting
sk_wmem_alloc to user, in PROC_FS files or various
ioctls (SIOCOUTQ/TIOCOUTQ)
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
On module unload call rcu_barrier(), this is needed as synchronize_rcu()
is not strong enough. The kmem_cache_destroy() does invoke
synchronize_rcu() but it does not provide same protection.
Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@comx.dk>
Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Prior implementation of the new sctp_connectx() call that returns
an association ID did not work correctly on non-blocking socket.
This is because we could not return both a EINPROGRESS error and
an association id. This is a new implementation that supports this.
Originally from Ivan Skytte Jørgensen <isj-sctp@i1.dk
Signed-off-by: Ivan Skytte Jørgensen <isj-sctp@i1.dk
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
RFC 5061 Section 5.1 ASCONF Chunk Procedures said:
B4) Re-transmit the ASCONF Chunk last sent and if possible choose an
alternate destination address (please refer to [RFC4960],
Section 6.4.1). An endpoint MUST NOT add new parameters to this
chunk; it MUST be the same (including its Sequence Number) as
the last ASCONF sent. An endpoint MAY, however, bundle an
additional ASCONF with new ASCONF parameters with the next
Sequence Number. For details, see Section 5.5.
This patch fix to choose an alternate destination address when
re-transmit the ASCONF chunk, with some dup codes cleanup.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
sctp_sack_timeout is defined as int, but the sysctl's maxsize is set
to sizeof(long) and the min/max are defined as long.
Signed-off-by: jean-mickael.guerin@6wind.com
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
If T4-rto timer is expired on a removed transport, kernel panic
will occur when we do failure management on that transport.
You can reproduce this use the following sequence:
Endpoint A Endpoint B
(ESTABLISHED) (ESTABLISHED)
<----------------- ASCONF
(SRC=X)
ASCONF ----------------->
(Delete IP Address = X)
<----------------- ASCONF-ACK
(Success Indication)
<----------------- ASCONF
(T4-rto timer expire)
This patch fixed the problem.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
If T2-shutdown timer is expired on a removed transport, kernel
panic will occur when we do failure management on that transport.
You can reproduce this use the following sequence:
Endpoint A Endpoint B
(ESTABLISHED) (ESTABLISHED)
<----------------- SHUTDOWN
(SRC=X)
ASCONF ----------------->
(Delete IP Address = X)
<----------------- ASCONF-ACK
(Success Indication)
<----------------- SHUTDOWN
(T2-shutdown timer expire)
This patch fixed the problem.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
If socket is create by PF_INET type, it can not used IPv6 address
to send/recv DATA. So only enable IPv6 address support on PF_INET6
socket.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Just fix a typo in net/sctp/sm_statetable.c.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Use Unresolvable Address error cause instead of Invalid Mandatory
Parameter error cause when process ASCONF chunk with invalid address
since address parameters are not mandatory in the ASCONF chunk.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
RFC5061 Section 5.2. Upon Reception of an ASCONF Chunk
V2) In processing the chunk, the receiver should build a
response message with the appropriate error TLVs, as
specified in the Parameter type bits, for any ASCONF
Parameter it does not understand. To indicate an
unrecognized parameter, Cause Type 8 should be used as
defined in the ERROR in Section 3.3.10.8, [RFC4960]. The
endpoint may also use the response to carry rejections for
other reasons, such as resource shortages, etc., using the
Error Cause TLV and an appropriate error condition.
So we should indicate an unrecognized parameter with error
SCTP_ERROR_UNKNOWN_PARAM in ACSONF-ACK chunk, not
SCTP_ERROR_INV_PARAM.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Define three accessors to get/set dst attached to a skb
struct dst_entry *skb_dst(const struct sk_buff *skb)
void skb_dst_set(struct sk_buff *skb, struct dst_entry *dst)
void skb_dst_drop(struct sk_buff *skb)
This one should replace occurrences of :
dst_release(skb->dst)
skb->dst = NULL;
Delete skb->dst field
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Define skb_rtable(const struct sk_buff *skb) accessor to get rtable from skb
Delete skb->rtable field
Setting rtable is not allowed, just set dst instead as rtable is an alias.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
this is the sctp code to enable hardware crc32c offload for
adapters that support it.
Originally by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
modified by Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Setting ->owner as done currently (pde->owner = THIS_MODULE) is racy
as correctly noted at bug #12454. Someone can lookup entry with NULL
->owner, thus not pinning enything, and release it later resulting
in module refcount underflow.
We can keep ->owner and supply it at registration time like ->proc_fops
and ->data.
But this leaves ->owner as easy-manipulative field (just one C assignment)
and somebody will forget to unpin previous/pin current module when
switching ->owner. ->proc_fops is declared as "const" which should give
some thoughts.
->read_proc/->write_proc were just fixed to not require ->owner for
protection.
rmmod'ed directories will be empty and return "." and ".." -- no harm.
And directories with tricky enough readdir and lookup shouldn't be modular.
We definitely don't want such modular code.
Removing ->owner will also make PDE smaller.
So, let's nuke it.
Kudos to Jeff Layton for reminding about this, let's say, oversight.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12454
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Remove 2 TEST_FRAME hacks that are no longer needed. These allowed
sctp regression tests to compile before, but are no longer needed.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
broken by commit 5e739d1752aca4e8f3e794d431503bfca3162df4; AFAICS should
be -stable fodder as well...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Aced-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
RFC5061 states:
Each adaptation layer that is defined that wishes
to use this parameter MUST specify an adaptation code point in an
appropriate RFC defining its use and meaning.
If the user has not set one - assume they don't want to sent the param
with a zero Adaptation Code Point.
Rationale - Currently the IANA defines zero as reserved - and
1 as the only valid value - so we consider zero to be unset - to save
adding a boolean to the socket structure.
Including this parameter unconditionally causes endpoints that do not
understand it to report errors unnecessarily.
Signed-off-by: Malcolm Lashley <mlashley@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
