The "Invalid Stream Identifier" error has a 16 bit reserved
field at the end, thus making the parameter length be 8 bytes.
We've never supplied that reserved field making wireshark
tag the packet as malformed.
Reported-by: Chris Dischino <cdischino@sonusnet.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Update the route and saddr entries for the non-active transports as some
of the added addresses can be used as better source addresses, or may
be there is a better route.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
This patch fix to check the unrecognized ASCONF parameter before
access it.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
The return value of sctp_process_asconf_ack() may be
overwritten while process parameters with no error.
This patch fixed the problem.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Use Unresolvable Address error cause instead of Invalid Mandatory
Parameter error cause when process ASCONF chunk with invalid address
since address parameters are not mandatory in the ASCONF chunk.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
RFC5061 Section 5.2. Upon Reception of an ASCONF Chunk
V2) In processing the chunk, the receiver should build a
response message with the appropriate error TLVs, as
specified in the Parameter type bits, for any ASCONF
Parameter it does not understand. To indicate an
unrecognized parameter, Cause Type 8 should be used as
defined in the ERROR in Section 3.3.10.8, [RFC4960]. The
endpoint may also use the response to carry rejections for
other reasons, such as resource shortages, etc., using the
Error Cause TLV and an appropriate error condition.
So we should indicate an unrecognized parameter with error
SCTP_ERROR_UNKNOWN_PARAM in ACSONF-ACK chunk, not
SCTP_ERROR_INV_PARAM.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
RFC5061 states:
Each adaptation layer that is defined that wishes
to use this parameter MUST specify an adaptation code point in an
appropriate RFC defining its use and meaning.
If the user has not set one - assume they don't want to sent the param
with a zero Adaptation Code Point.
Rationale - Currently the IANA defines zero as reserved - and
1 as the only valid value - so we consider zero to be unset - to save
adding a boolean to the socket structure.
Including this parameter unconditionally causes endpoints that do not
understand it to report errors unnecessarily.
Signed-off-by: Malcolm Lashley <mlashley@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This patch fix to indicate ASCONF support in INIT-ACK only if peer has
such capable.
This patch also fix to calc the chunk size if peer has no FWD-TSN
capable.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Base versions handle constant folding now.
Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The gabs array in the sctp_tsnmap structure is only used
in one place, sctp_make_sack(). As such, carrying the
array around in the sctp_tsnmap and thus directly in
the sctp_association is rather pointless since most
of the time it's just taking up space. Now, let
sctp_make_sack create and populate it and then throw
it away when it's done.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The tsn map currently use is 4K large and is stuck inside
the sctp_association structure making memory references REALLY
expensive. What we really need is at most 4K worth of bits
so the biggest map we would have is 512 bytes. Also, the
map is only really usefull when we have gaps to store and
report. As such, starting with minimal map of say 32 TSNs (bits)
should be enough for normal low-loss operations. We can grow
the map by some multiple of 32 along with some extra room any
time we receive the TSN which would put us outside of the map
boundry. As we close gaps, we can shift the map to rebase
it on the latest TSN we've seen. This saves 4088 bytes per
association just in the map alone along savings from the now
unnecessary structure members.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The INIT perameter carries the adapatation value in network-byte
order. We need to store it in host byte order as expected
by data types and the user API.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
sctp_chunks should be put on a diet. This is some of the low hanging
fruit that we can strip out. Changes all the __s8/__u8 flags to
bitfields. Saves 12 bytes per chunk.
Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Since call to function sctp_sf_abort_violation() need paramter 'arg' with
'struct sctp_chunk' type, it will read the chunk type and chunk length from
the chunk_hdr member of chunk. But call to sctp_sf_violation_paramlen()
always with 'struct sctp_paramhdr' type's parameter, it will be passed to
sctp_sf_abort_violation(). This may cause kernel panic.
sctp_sf_violation_paramlen()
|-- sctp_sf_abort_violation()
|-- sctp_make_abort_violation()
This patch fixed this problem. This patch also fix two place which called
sctp_sf_violation_paramlen() with wrong paramter type.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
If INIT-ACK is received with SupportedExtensions parameter which
indicates that the peer does not support AUTH, the packet will be
silently ignore, and sctp_process_init() do cleanup all of the
transports in the association.
When T1-Init timer is expires, OOPS happen while we try to choose
a different init transport.
The solution is to only clean up the non-active transports, i.e
the ones that the peer added. However, that introduces a problem
with sctp_connectx(), because we don't mark the proper state for
the transports provided by the user. So, we'll simply mark
user-provided transports as ACTIVE. That will allow INIT
retransmissions to work properly in the sctp_connectx() context
and prevent the crash.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Do not enable peer features like addip and auth, if they
are administratively disabled localy. If the peer resports
that he supports something that we don't, neither end can
use it so enabling it is pointless. This solves a problem
when talking to a peer that has auth and addip enabled while
we do not. Found by Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul <andrei@iptel.org>.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Introduced by c4492586 (sctp: Add address type check while process
paramaters of ASCONF chunk):
net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c: In function 'sctp_process_asconf':
net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c:2828: warning: 'addr_param' may be used uninitialized in this function
net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c:2828: note: 'addr_param' was declared here
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
If socket is create by AF_INET type, add IPv6 address to asoc will cause
kernel panic while packet is transmitted on that transport.
This patch add address type check before process paramaters of ASCONF
chunk. If peer is not support this address type, return with error
invald parameter.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
If socket is create by PF_INET type, it can not used IPv6 address to
send/recv DATA, So we can not used IPv6 address even if peer tell us it
support IPv6 address.
This patch fix to only enabled peer IPv6 address support on PF_INET6 socket.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Replacing (almost) all invocations of list_for_each() with
list_for_each_entry() tightens up the code and allows for the deletion
of numerous list iterator variables that are no longer necessary.
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
RFC 4890 has the following text:
The HMAC algorithm based on SHA-1 MUST be supported and
included in the HMAC-ALGO parameter.
As a result, we need to check in sctp_verify_param() that HMAC_SHA1 is
present in the list. If not, we should probably treat this as a
protocol violation.
It should also be a protocol violation if the HMAC parameter is empty.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
If an address family is not listed in "Supported Address Types"
parameter(INIT Chunk), but the packet is sent by that family, this
address family should be considered as supported by peer. Otherwise,
an error condition will occur. For instance, if kernel receives an
IPV6 SCTP INIT chunk with "Support Address Types" parameter which
indicates just supporting IPV4 Address family. Kernel will reply an
IPV6 SCTP INIT ACK packet, but the source ipv6 address in ipv6 header
will be vacant. This is not correct.
refer to RFC4460 as following:
IMPLEMENTATION NOTE: If an SCTP endpoint lists in the 'Supported
Address Types' parameter either IPv4 or IPv6, but uses the other
family for sending the packet containing the INIT chunk, or if it
also lists addresses of the other family in the INIT chunk, then
the address family that is not listed in the 'Supported Address
Types' parameter SHOULD also be considered as supported by the
receiver of the INIT chunk. The receiver of the INIT chunk SHOULD
NOT respond with any kind of error indication.
Here is a fix to comply to RFC.
Signed-off-by: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
In a few instances, we need to remove the chunk from the transmitted list
prior to freeing it. This is because the free code doesn't do that any
more and so we need to do it manually.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
I was notified by Randy Stewart that lksctp claims to be
"the reference implementation". First of all, "the
refrence implementation" was the original implementation
of SCTP in usersapce written ty Randy and a few others.
Second, after looking at the definiton of 'reference implementation',
we don't really meet the requirements.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
This patch fix miss of check for report unrecognized HMAC Algorithm
parameter. When AUTH is disabled, goto fall through path to report
unrecognized parameter, else, just break
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The Security Considerations section of RFC 5061 has the following
text:
If an SCTP endpoint that supports this extension receives an INIT
that indicates that the peer supports the ASCONF extension but does
NOT support the [RFC4895] extension, the receiver of such an INIT
MUST send an ABORT in response. Note that an implementation is
allowed to silently discard such an INIT as an option as well, but
under NO circumstance is an implementation allowed to proceed with
the association setup by sending an INIT-ACK in response.
An implementation that receives an INIT-ACK that indicates that the
peer does not support the [RFC4895] extension MUST NOT send the
COOKIE-ECHO to establish the association. Instead, the
implementation MUST discard the INIT-ACK and report to the upper-
layer user that an association cannot be established destroying the
Transmission Control Block (TCB).
Follow the recomendations.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The processing of the ASCONF chunks has changed a lot in the
spec. New items are:
1. A list of ASCONF-ACK chunks is now cached
2. The source of the packet is used in response.
3. New handling for unexpect ASCONF chunks.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The ADD-IP "Set Primary IP Address" parameter is allowed in the
INIT/INIT-ACK exchange. Allow processing of this parameter during
the INIT/INIT-ACK.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The Address Parameter in the parameter list of the ASCONF chunk
may be a wildcard address. In this case special processing
is required. For the 'add' case, the source IP of the packet is
added. In the 'del' case, all addresses except the source IP
of packet are removed. In the "mark primary" case, the source
address is marked as primary.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Some recent changes completely removed accounting for the FORWARD_TSN
parameter length in the INIT and INIT-ACK chunk. This is wrong and
should be restored.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Supported extensions parameter was not coded right and ended up
over-writing memory or causing skb overflows. First, remove
the FWD_TSN support from as it shouldn't be there and also fix
the paramter encoding.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
There was a typo that cleared the HMACS parameters when no
authenticated chunks were specified. We whould be clearing
the chunks pointer instead of the hmacs.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
SCTP-AUTH and future ADD-IP updates have a requirement to
do additional verification of parameters and an ability to
ABORT the association if verification fails. So, introduce
additional return code so that we can clear signal a required
action.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
This patch adds a tunable that will allow ADD_IP to work without
AUTH for backward compatibility. The default value is off since
the default value for ADD_IP is off as well. People who need
to use ADD-IP with older implementations take risks of connection
hijacking and should consider upgrading or turning this tunable on.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
After learning more about rcu, it looks like the ADD-IP hadling
doesn't need to call call_rcu_bh. All the rcu critical sections
use rcu_read_lock, so using call_rcu_bh is wrong here.
Now, restore the local_bh_disable() code blocks and use normal
call_rcu() calls. Also restore the missing return statement.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
If ASCONF chunk is bundled with other chunks as the first chunk, when
process the ASCONF parameters, full packet data will be process as the
parameters of the ASCONF chunk, not only the real parameters. So if you
send a ASCONF chunk bundled with other chunks, you will get an unexpect
result.
This problem also exists when ASCONF-ACK chunk is bundled with other chunks.
This patch fix this problem.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
This patch fixes the errors made in the users of the crypto layer during
the sg_init_table conversion. It also adds a few conversions that were
missing altogether.
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Most drivers need to set length and offset as well, so may as well fold
those three lines into one.
Add sg_assign_page() for those two locations that only needed to set
the page, where the offset/length is set outside of the function context.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
sctp fails to compile with
net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c: In function 'sctp_pack_cookie':
net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c:1516: error: implicit declaration of function 'sg_init_table'
net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c:1517: error: implicit declaration of function 'sg_set_page'
use the proper include file.
SCTP maintainers Vlad Yasevich and Sridhar Samudrala are CCed.
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
ADD-IP spec requires AUTH. It is, in fact, dangerous without AUTH.
So, disable ADD-IP functionality if the peer claims to support
ADD-IP, but not AUTH.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
SCTP-AUTH, Section 6.2:
Endpoints MUST send all requested chunks authenticated where this has
been requested by the peer. The other chunks MAY be sent
authenticated or not. If endpoint pair shared keys are used, one of
them MUST be selected for authentication.
To send chunks in an authenticated way, the sender MUST include these
chunks after an AUTH chunk. This means that a sender MUST bundle
chunks in order to authenticate them.
If the endpoint has no endpoint pair shared key for the peer, it MUST
use Shared Key Identifier 0 with an empty endpoint pair shared key.
If there are multiple endpoint shared keys the sender selects one and
uses the corresponding Shared Key Identifier
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Implement processing for the CHUNKS, RANDOM, and HMAC parameters and
deal with how this parameters are effected by association restarts.
In particular, during unexpeted INIT processing, we need to reply with
parameters from the original INIT chunk. Also, after restart, we need
to update the old association with new peer parameters and change the
association shared keys.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
SCTP Supported Extenions parameter is specified in Section 4.2.7
of the ADD-IP draft (soon to be RFC). The parameter is
encoded as:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Parameter Type = 0x8008 | Parameter Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| CHUNK TYPE 1 | CHUNK TYPE 2 | CHUNK TYPE 3 | CHUNK TYPE 4 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| .... |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| CHUNK TYPE N | PAD | PAD | PAD |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
It contains a list of chunks that a particular SCTP extension
uses. Current extensions supported are Partial Reliability
(FWD-TSN) and ADD-IP (ASCONF and ASCONF-ACK).
When implementing new extensions (AUTH, PKT-DROP, etc..), new
chunks need to be added to this parameter. Parameter processing
would be modified to negotiate support for these new features.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
