mirror of
https://github.com/adulau/aha.git
synced 2024-12-28 03:36:19 +00:00
[PATCH] Fix PCI BAR size interpretation on 64-bit arches
On 64-bit machines, PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_MASK and other mask constants passed to pci_size() are 64-bit (for example ~0x0fUL). However, pci_size does comparisons between the u32 arguments and the mask, which will fail even though any result from pci_size is still just 32-bit. Changing the mask argument to u32 seems the obvious thing to do, since all arithmetic in the function is 32-bit and having a larger mask makes no sense. This triggered on a PPC64 system here where an adapter (VGA, as it happened) had a memory region base of 0xfe000000 and a sz of the same, matching the if (max == maxbase ...) test at the bottom of pci_size but failing the mask comparison. Quite a corner case which I guess explains why we haven't seen it until now. Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Acked-by: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a3c77c67a4
commit
f797f9cc54
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static inline unsigned int pci_calc_resource_flags(unsigned int flags)
|
|||
/*
|
||||
* Find the extent of a PCI decode..
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static u32 pci_size(u32 base, u32 maxbase, unsigned long mask)
|
||||
static u32 pci_size(u32 base, u32 maxbase, u32 mask)
|
||||
{
|
||||
u32 size = mask & maxbase; /* Find the significant bits */
|
||||
if (!size)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue