mirror of
https://github.com/adulau/aha.git
synced 2024-12-28 03:36:19 +00:00
sched: skip updating rq's next_balance under null SD
Was playing with sched_smt_power_savings/sched_mc_power_savings and found out that while the scheduler domains are reconstructed when sysfs settings change, rebalance_domains() can get triggered with null domain on other cpus, which is setting next_balance to jiffies + 60*HZ. Resulting in no idle/busy balancing for 60 seconds. Fix this. Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f8700df7c4
commit
f549da848e
1 changed files with 12 additions and 2 deletions
|
@ -3043,6 +3043,7 @@ static inline void rebalance_domains(int cpu, enum cpu_idle_type idle)
|
|||
struct sched_domain *sd;
|
||||
/* Earliest time when we have to do rebalance again */
|
||||
unsigned long next_balance = jiffies + 60*HZ;
|
||||
int update_next_balance = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
for_each_domain(cpu, sd) {
|
||||
if (!(sd->flags & SD_LOAD_BALANCE))
|
||||
|
@ -3079,8 +3080,10 @@ static inline void rebalance_domains(int cpu, enum cpu_idle_type idle)
|
|||
if (sd->flags & SD_SERIALIZE)
|
||||
spin_unlock(&balancing);
|
||||
out:
|
||||
if (time_after(next_balance, sd->last_balance + interval))
|
||||
if (time_after(next_balance, sd->last_balance + interval)) {
|
||||
next_balance = sd->last_balance + interval;
|
||||
update_next_balance = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Stop the load balance at this level. There is another
|
||||
|
@ -3090,7 +3093,14 @@ out:
|
|||
if (!balance)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
rq->next_balance = next_balance;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* next_balance will be updated only when there is a need.
|
||||
* When the cpu is attached to null domain for ex, it will not be
|
||||
* updated.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (likely(update_next_balance))
|
||||
rq->next_balance = next_balance;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue