mirror of
https://github.com/adulau/aha.git
synced 2024-12-29 12:16:20 +00:00
perf_counter, x86: introduce max_period variable
In x86 pmus the allowed counter period to programm differs. This introduces a max_period value and allows the generic implementation for all models to check the max period. [ Impact: generalize code ] Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <1241002046-8832-27-git-send-email-robert.richter@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
parent
4b7bfd0d27
commit
c619b8ffb1
1 changed files with 12 additions and 8 deletions
|
@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ struct x86_pmu {
|
|||
int num_counters_fixed;
|
||||
int counter_bits;
|
||||
u64 counter_mask;
|
||||
u64 max_period;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
static struct x86_pmu x86_pmu __read_mostly;
|
||||
|
@ -279,14 +280,8 @@ static int __hw_perf_counter_init(struct perf_counter *counter)
|
|||
hwc->nmi = 1;
|
||||
|
||||
hwc->irq_period = hw_event->irq_period;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Intel PMCs cannot be accessed sanely above 32 bit width,
|
||||
* so we install an artificial 1<<31 period regardless of
|
||||
* the generic counter period:
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL)
|
||||
if ((s64)hwc->irq_period <= 0 || hwc->irq_period > 0x7FFFFFFF)
|
||||
hwc->irq_period = 0x7FFFFFFF;
|
||||
if ((s64)hwc->irq_period <= 0 || hwc->irq_period > x86_pmu.max_period)
|
||||
hwc->irq_period = x86_pmu.max_period;
|
||||
|
||||
atomic64_set(&hwc->period_left, hwc->irq_period);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -910,6 +905,12 @@ static struct x86_pmu intel_pmu = {
|
|||
.event_map = intel_pmu_event_map,
|
||||
.raw_event = intel_pmu_raw_event,
|
||||
.max_events = ARRAY_SIZE(intel_perfmon_event_map),
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Intel PMCs cannot be accessed sanely above 32 bit width,
|
||||
* so we install an artificial 1<<31 period regardless of
|
||||
* the generic counter period:
|
||||
*/
|
||||
.max_period = (1ULL << 31) - 1,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
static struct x86_pmu amd_pmu = {
|
||||
|
@ -927,6 +928,8 @@ static struct x86_pmu amd_pmu = {
|
|||
.num_counters = 4,
|
||||
.counter_bits = 48,
|
||||
.counter_mask = (1ULL << 48) - 1,
|
||||
/* use highest bit to detect overflow */
|
||||
.max_period = (1ULL << 47) - 1,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
static int intel_pmu_init(void)
|
||||
|
@ -999,6 +1002,7 @@ void __init init_hw_perf_counters(void)
|
|||
perf_max_counters = x86_pmu.num_counters;
|
||||
|
||||
pr_info("... value mask: %016Lx\n", x86_pmu.counter_mask);
|
||||
pr_info("... max period: %016Lx\n", x86_pmu.max_period);
|
||||
|
||||
if (x86_pmu.num_counters_fixed > X86_PMC_MAX_FIXED) {
|
||||
x86_pmu.num_counters_fixed = X86_PMC_MAX_FIXED;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue