mirror of
https://github.com/adulau/aha.git
synced 2024-12-29 12:16:20 +00:00
[XFRM] xfrm_user: Better validation of user templates.
Since we never checked the ->family value of templates before, many applications simply leave it at zero. Detect this and fix it up to be the pol->family value. Also, do not clobber xp->family while reading in templates, that is not necessary. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
2b5f6dcce5
commit
b4ad86bf52
1 changed files with 42 additions and 8 deletions
|
@ -858,7 +858,6 @@ static void copy_templates(struct xfrm_policy *xp, struct xfrm_user_tmpl *ut,
|
|||
int i;
|
||||
|
||||
xp->xfrm_nr = nr;
|
||||
xp->family = ut->family;
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < nr; i++, ut++) {
|
||||
struct xfrm_tmpl *t = &xp->xfrm_vec[i];
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -876,19 +875,53 @@ static void copy_templates(struct xfrm_policy *xp, struct xfrm_user_tmpl *ut,
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int validate_tmpl(int nr, struct xfrm_user_tmpl *ut, u16 family)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
|
||||
if (nr > XFRM_MAX_DEPTH)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
|
||||
/* We never validated the ut->family value, so many
|
||||
* applications simply leave it at zero. The check was
|
||||
* never made and ut->family was ignored because all
|
||||
* templates could be assumed to have the same family as
|
||||
* the policy itself. Now that we will have ipv4-in-ipv6
|
||||
* and ipv6-in-ipv4 tunnels, this is no longer true.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!ut[i].family)
|
||||
ut[i].family = family;
|
||||
|
||||
switch (ut[i].family) {
|
||||
case AF_INET:
|
||||
break;
|
||||
#if defined(CONFIG_IPV6) || defined(CONFIG_IPV6_MODULE)
|
||||
case AF_INET6:
|
||||
break;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
default:
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int copy_from_user_tmpl(struct xfrm_policy *pol, struct rtattr **xfrma)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct rtattr *rt = xfrma[XFRMA_TMPL-1];
|
||||
struct xfrm_user_tmpl *utmpl;
|
||||
int nr;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!rt) {
|
||||
pol->xfrm_nr = 0;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
nr = (rt->rta_len - sizeof(*rt)) / sizeof(*utmpl);
|
||||
struct xfrm_user_tmpl *utmpl = RTA_DATA(rt);
|
||||
int nr = (rt->rta_len - sizeof(*rt)) / sizeof(*utmpl);
|
||||
int err;
|
||||
|
||||
if (nr > XFRM_MAX_DEPTH)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
err = validate_tmpl(nr, utmpl, pol->family);
|
||||
if (err)
|
||||
return err;
|
||||
|
||||
copy_templates(pol, RTA_DATA(rt), nr);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -1530,7 +1563,8 @@ static int xfrm_add_acquire(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh, void **xf
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* build an XP */
|
||||
xp = xfrm_policy_construct(&ua->policy, (struct rtattr **) xfrma, &err); if (!xp) {
|
||||
xp = xfrm_policy_construct(&ua->policy, (struct rtattr **) xfrma, &err);
|
||||
if (!xp) {
|
||||
kfree(x);
|
||||
return err;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -1979,7 +2013,7 @@ static struct xfrm_policy *xfrm_compile_policy(struct sock *sk, int opt,
|
|||
return NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
nr = ((len - sizeof(*p)) / sizeof(*ut));
|
||||
if (nr > XFRM_MAX_DEPTH)
|
||||
if (validate_tmpl(nr, ut, p->sel.family))
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
if (p->dir > XFRM_POLICY_OUT)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue