mirror of
https://github.com/adulau/aha.git
synced 2024-12-28 03:36:19 +00:00
sched: prevent divide by zero error in cpu_avg_load_per_task, update
Regarding the bug addressed in:
4cd4262
: sched: prevent divide by zero error in cpu_avg_load_per_task
Linus points out that the fix is not complete:
> There's nothing that keeps gcc from deciding not to reload
> rq->nr_running.
>
> Of course, in _practice_, I don't think gcc ever will (if it decides
> that it will spill, gcc is likely going to decide that it will
> literally spill the local variable to the stack rather than decide to
> reload off the pointer), but it's a valid compiler optimization, and
> it even has a name (rematerialization).
>
> So I suspect that your patch does fix the bug, but it still leaves the
> fairly unlikely _potential_ for it to re-appear at some point.
>
> We have ACCESS_ONCE() as a macro to guarantee that the compiler
> doesn't rematerialize a pointer access. That also would clarify
> the fact that we access something unsafe outside a lock.
So make sure our nr_running value is immutable and cannot change
after we check it for nonzero.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
parent
1583715ddb
commit
af6d596fd6
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -1453,7 +1453,7 @@ static int task_hot(struct task_struct *p, u64 now, struct sched_domain *sd);
|
|||
static unsigned long cpu_avg_load_per_task(int cpu)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
|
||||
unsigned long nr_running = rq->nr_running;
|
||||
unsigned long nr_running = ACCESS_ONCE(rq->nr_running);
|
||||
|
||||
if (nr_running)
|
||||
rq->avg_load_per_task = rq->load.weight / nr_running;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue