mirror of
https://github.com/adulau/aha.git
synced 2024-12-28 03:36:19 +00:00
cfq-iosched: fix sequential write regression
We have a 10-15% performance regression for sequential writes on TCQ/NCQ enabled drives in 2.6.21-rcX after the CFQ update went in. It has been reported by Valerie Clement <valerie.clement@bull.net> and the Intel testing folks. The regression is because of CFQ's now more aggressive queue control, limiting the depth available to the device. This patches fixes that regression by allowing a greater depth when only one queue is busy. It has been tested to not impact sync-vs-async workloads too much - we still do a lot better than 2.6.20. Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
46fcc86dd7
commit
a993800655
1 changed files with 19 additions and 15 deletions
|
@ -986,9 +986,9 @@ __cfq_dispatch_requests(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq,
|
|||
* expire an async queue immediately if it has used up its slice. idle
|
||||
* queue always expire after 1 dispatch round.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if ((!cfq_cfqq_sync(cfqq) &&
|
||||
if (cfqd->busy_queues > 1 && ((!cfq_cfqq_sync(cfqq) &&
|
||||
cfqd->dispatch_slice >= cfq_prio_to_maxrq(cfqd, cfqq)) ||
|
||||
cfq_class_idle(cfqq)) {
|
||||
cfq_class_idle(cfqq))) {
|
||||
cfqq->slice_end = jiffies + 1;
|
||||
cfq_slice_expired(cfqd, 0, 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -1051,19 +1051,21 @@ cfq_dispatch_requests(request_queue_t *q, int force)
|
|||
while ((cfqq = cfq_select_queue(cfqd)) != NULL) {
|
||||
int max_dispatch;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Don't repeat dispatch from the previous queue.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (prev_cfqq == cfqq)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
if (cfqd->busy_queues > 1) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Don't repeat dispatch from the previous queue.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (prev_cfqq == cfqq)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* So we have dispatched before in this round, if the
|
||||
* next queue has idling enabled (must be sync), don't
|
||||
* allow it service until the previous have continued.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (cfqd->rq_in_driver && cfq_cfqq_idle_window(cfqq))
|
||||
break;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* So we have dispatched before in this round, if the
|
||||
* next queue has idling enabled (must be sync), don't
|
||||
* allow it service until the previous have continued.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (cfqd->rq_in_driver && cfq_cfqq_idle_window(cfqq))
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
cfq_clear_cfqq_must_dispatch(cfqq);
|
||||
cfq_clear_cfqq_wait_request(cfqq);
|
||||
|
@ -1370,7 +1372,9 @@ retry:
|
|||
atomic_set(&cfqq->ref, 0);
|
||||
cfqq->cfqd = cfqd;
|
||||
|
||||
cfq_mark_cfqq_idle_window(cfqq);
|
||||
if (key != CFQ_KEY_ASYNC)
|
||||
cfq_mark_cfqq_idle_window(cfqq);
|
||||
|
||||
cfq_mark_cfqq_prio_changed(cfqq);
|
||||
cfq_mark_cfqq_queue_new(cfqq);
|
||||
cfq_init_prio_data(cfqq);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue