iwlwifi: fix FAT channel config for 5000 series

The test to find out if we have FAT channels do not consider that
the value of regulatory_bands for the 5000 series is larger than its
eeprom size. Using the eeprom size is strange in itself.

Use a new EEPROM_REGULATORY_BAND_NO_FAT to indicate no FAT support
and test for that explicitly.

Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Acked-by: Samuel Ortiz <samuel.ortiz@intel.com>
Tested-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
This commit is contained in:
Reinette Chatre 2009-02-10 15:19:04 -08:00 committed by John W. Linville
parent 24566f4a15
commit a89d03c423
3 changed files with 8 additions and 6 deletions

View file

@ -2738,8 +2738,8 @@ static struct iwl_lib_ops iwl3945_lib = {
EEPROM_REGULATORY_BAND_3_CHANNELS,
EEPROM_REGULATORY_BAND_4_CHANNELS,
EEPROM_REGULATORY_BAND_5_CHANNELS,
IWL3945_EEPROM_IMG_SIZE,
IWL3945_EEPROM_IMG_SIZE,
EEPROM_REGULATORY_BAND_NO_FAT,
EEPROM_REGULATORY_BAND_NO_FAT,
},
.verify_signature = iwlcore_eeprom_verify_signature,
.acquire_semaphore = iwl3945_eeprom_acquire_semaphore,

View file

@ -532,10 +532,10 @@ int iwl_init_channel_map(struct iwl_priv *priv)
}
/* Check if we do have FAT channels */
if (priv->cfg->ops->lib->eeprom_ops.regulatory_bands[5] >=
priv->cfg->eeprom_size &&
priv->cfg->ops->lib->eeprom_ops.regulatory_bands[6] >=
priv->cfg->eeprom_size)
if (priv->cfg->ops->lib->eeprom_ops.regulatory_bands[5] ==
EEPROM_REGULATORY_BAND_NO_FAT &&
priv->cfg->ops->lib->eeprom_ops.regulatory_bands[6] ==
EEPROM_REGULATORY_BAND_NO_FAT)
return 0;
/* Two additional EEPROM bands for 2.4 and 5 GHz FAT channels */

View file

@ -370,6 +370,8 @@ struct iwl_eeprom_calib_info {
*/
#define EEPROM_4965_REGULATORY_BAND_52_FAT_CHANNELS (2*0xA8) /* 22 bytes */
#define EEPROM_REGULATORY_BAND_NO_FAT (0)
struct iwl_eeprom_ops {
const u32 regulatory_bands[7];
int (*verify_signature) (struct iwl_priv *priv);