From a70dcb969f64e2fa98c24f47854f20bf02ff0092 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Gerald Schaefer Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 12:53:36 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] memory hotplug: fix page_zone() calculation in test_pages_isolated() My last bugfix here (adding zone->lock) introduced a new problem: Using page_zone(pfn_to_page(pfn)) to get the zone after the for() loop is wrong. pfn will then be >= end_pfn, which may be in a different zone or not present at all. This may lead to an addressing exception in page_zone() or spin_lock_irqsave(). Now I use __first_valid_page() again after the loop to find a valid page for page_zone(). Signed-off-by: Gerald Schaefer Acked-by: Nathan Fontenot Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- mm/page_isolation.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/page_isolation.c b/mm/page_isolation.c index b70a7fec1ff..5e0ffd96745 100644 --- a/mm/page_isolation.c +++ b/mm/page_isolation.c @@ -130,10 +130,11 @@ int test_pages_isolated(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn) if (page && get_pageblock_migratetype(page) != MIGRATE_ISOLATE) break; } - if (pfn < end_pfn) + page = __first_valid_page(start_pfn, end_pfn - start_pfn); + if ((pfn < end_pfn) || !page) return -EBUSY; /* Check all pages are free or Marked as ISOLATED */ - zone = page_zone(pfn_to_page(pfn)); + zone = page_zone(page); spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lock, flags); ret = __test_page_isolated_in_pageblock(start_pfn, end_pfn); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lock, flags);