mirror of
https://github.com/adulau/aha.git
synced 2024-12-27 11:16:11 +00:00
ipc/sem.c: sem use list operations
Replace the handcoded list operations in update_queue() with the standard list_for_each_entry macros. list_for_each_entry_safe() must be used, because list entries can disappear immediately uppon the wakeup event. Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com> Cc: Pierre Peiffer <peifferp@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
bf17bb7177
commit
9cad200c76
1 changed files with 31 additions and 44 deletions
75
ipc/sem.c
75
ipc/sem.c
|
@ -403,58 +403,45 @@ undo:
|
|||
*/
|
||||
static void update_queue (struct sem_array * sma)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int error;
|
||||
struct sem_queue * q;
|
||||
struct sem_queue *q, *tq;
|
||||
|
||||
again:
|
||||
list_for_each_entry_safe(q, tq, &sma->sem_pending, list) {
|
||||
int error;
|
||||
int alter;
|
||||
|
||||
q = list_entry(sma->sem_pending.next, struct sem_queue, list);
|
||||
while (&q->list != &sma->sem_pending) {
|
||||
error = try_atomic_semop(sma, q->sops, q->nsops,
|
||||
q->undo, q->pid);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Does q->sleeper still need to sleep? */
|
||||
if (error <= 0) {
|
||||
struct sem_queue *n;
|
||||
if (error > 0)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Continue scanning. The next operation
|
||||
* that must be checked depends on the type of the
|
||||
* completed operation:
|
||||
* - if the operation modified the array, then
|
||||
* restart from the head of the queue and
|
||||
* check for threads that might be waiting
|
||||
* for semaphore values to become 0.
|
||||
* - if the operation didn't modify the array,
|
||||
* then just continue.
|
||||
* The order of list_del() and reading ->next
|
||||
* is crucial: In the former case, the list_del()
|
||||
* must be done first [because we might be the
|
||||
* first entry in ->sem_pending], in the latter
|
||||
* case the list_del() must be done last
|
||||
* [because the list is invalid after the list_del()]
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (q->alter) {
|
||||
list_del(&q->list);
|
||||
n = list_entry(sma->sem_pending.next,
|
||||
struct sem_queue, list);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
n = list_entry(q->list.next, struct sem_queue,
|
||||
list);
|
||||
list_del(&q->list);
|
||||
}
|
||||
list_del(&q->list);
|
||||
|
||||
/* wake up the waiting thread */
|
||||
q->status = IN_WAKEUP;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The next operation that must be checked depends on the type
|
||||
* of the completed operation:
|
||||
* - if the operation modified the array, then restart from the
|
||||
* head of the queue and check for threads that might be
|
||||
* waiting for semaphore values to become 0.
|
||||
* - if the operation didn't modify the array, then just
|
||||
* continue.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
alter = q->alter;
|
||||
|
||||
wake_up_process(q->sleeper);
|
||||
/* hands-off: q will disappear immediately after
|
||||
* writing q->status.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
smp_wmb();
|
||||
q->status = error;
|
||||
q = n;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
q = list_entry(q->list.next, struct sem_queue, list);
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* wake up the waiting thread */
|
||||
q->status = IN_WAKEUP;
|
||||
|
||||
wake_up_process(q->sleeper);
|
||||
/* hands-off: q will disappear immediately after
|
||||
* writing q->status.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
smp_wmb();
|
||||
q->status = error;
|
||||
|
||||
if (alter)
|
||||
goto again;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue