mirror of
https://github.com/adulau/aha.git
synced 2024-12-27 11:16:11 +00:00
UBIFS: return error if link and unlink race
Consider a scenario when 'vfs_link(dirA/fileA)' and 'vfs_unlink(dirA/fileA, dirB/fileB)' race. 'vfs_link()' does not lock 'dirA->i_mutex', so this is possible. Both of the functions lock 'fileA->i_mutex' though. Suppose 'vfs_unlink()' wins, and takes 'fileA->i_mutex' mutex first. Suppose 'fileA->i_nlink' is 1. In this case 'ubifs_unlink()' will drop the last reference, and put 'inodeA' to the list of orphans. After this, 'vfs_link()' will link 'dirB/fileB' to 'inodeA'. Thir is a problem because, for example, the subsequent 'vfs_unlink(dirB/fileB)' will add the same inode to the list of orphans. This problem was reported by J. R. Okajima <hooanon05@yahoo.co.jp> [Artem: add more comments, amended commit message] Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
6d6cb0d688
commit
8b3884a841
1 changed files with 19 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -528,6 +528,25 @@ static int ubifs_link(struct dentry *old_dentry, struct inode *dir,
|
|||
inode->i_nlink, dir->i_ino);
|
||||
ubifs_assert(mutex_is_locked(&dir->i_mutex));
|
||||
ubifs_assert(mutex_is_locked(&inode->i_mutex));
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Return -ENOENT if we've raced with unlink and i_nlink is 0. Doing
|
||||
* otherwise has the potential to corrupt the orphan inode list.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Indeed, consider a scenario when 'vfs_link(dirA/fileA)' and
|
||||
* 'vfs_unlink(dirA/fileA, dirB/fileB)' race. 'vfs_link()' does not
|
||||
* lock 'dirA->i_mutex', so this is possible. Both of the functions
|
||||
* lock 'fileA->i_mutex' though. Suppose 'vfs_unlink()' wins, and takes
|
||||
* 'fileA->i_mutex' mutex first. Suppose 'fileA->i_nlink' is 1. In this
|
||||
* case 'ubifs_unlink()' will drop the last reference, and put 'inodeA'
|
||||
* to the list of orphans. After this, 'vfs_link()' will link
|
||||
* 'dirB/fileB' to 'inodeA'. This is a problem because, for example,
|
||||
* the subsequent 'vfs_unlink(dirB/fileB)' will add the same inode
|
||||
* to the list of orphans.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (inode->i_nlink == 0)
|
||||
return -ENOENT;
|
||||
|
||||
err = dbg_check_synced_i_size(inode);
|
||||
if (err)
|
||||
return err;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue