mirror of
https://github.com/adulau/aha.git
synced 2024-12-28 19:56:18 +00:00
[JFFS2][XATTR] Add a description about c->xattr_sem
Add a description about the c->xattr_sem read/write semaphore into README.Locking. [3/10] jffs2-xattr-v5.1-03-append_README.Locking.patch Signed-off-by: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
de1f72fab3
commit
8b0b339d46
1 changed files with 21 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -150,3 +150,24 @@ the buffer.
|
|||
|
||||
Ordering constraints:
|
||||
Lock wbuf_sem last, after the alloc_sem or and f->sem.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
c->xattr_sem
|
||||
------------
|
||||
|
||||
This read/write semaphore protects against concurrent access to the
|
||||
xattr related objects which include stuff in superblock and ic->xref.
|
||||
In read-only path, write-semaphore is too much exclusion. It's enough
|
||||
by read-semaphore. But you must hold write-semaphore when updating,
|
||||
creating or deleting any xattr related object.
|
||||
|
||||
Once xattr_sem released, there would be no assurance for the existence
|
||||
of those objects. Thus, a series of processes is often required to retry,
|
||||
when updating such a object is necessary under holding read semaphore.
|
||||
For example, do_jffs2_getxattr() holds read-semaphore to scan xref and
|
||||
xdatum at first. But it retries this process with holding write-semaphore
|
||||
after release read-semaphore, if it's necessary to load name/value pair
|
||||
from medium.
|
||||
|
||||
Ordering constraints:
|
||||
Lock xattr_sem last, after the alloc_sem.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue