mirror of
https://github.com/adulau/aha.git
synced 2024-12-27 19:26:25 +00:00
[PATCH] missing unused dentry in prune_dcache()?
On the the following patch: http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.6/gnupatch@449b144ecSF1rYskg3q-SeR2vf88zg # ChangeSet # 2006/06/22 15:05:57-07:00 neilb@suse.de # [PATCH] Fix dcache race during umount # If prune_dcache finds a dentry that it cannot free, it leaves it where it # is (at the tail of the list) and exits, on the assumption that some other # thread will be removing that dentry soon. However as far as I see this comment is not correct: when we cannot take s_umount rw_semaphore (for example because it was taken in do_remount) this dentry is already extracted from dentry_unused list and we do not add it into the list again. Therefore dentry will not be found by prune_dcache() and shrink_dcache_sb() and will leave in memory very long time until the partition will be unmounted. The patch adds this dentry into tail of the dentry_unused list. Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <vvs@sw.ru> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ebed4bfc8d
commit
6eac3f93f5
1 changed files with 5 additions and 4 deletions
|
@ -478,11 +478,12 @@ static void prune_dcache(int count, struct super_block *sb)
|
|||
up_read(s_umount);
|
||||
}
|
||||
spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
|
||||
/* Cannot remove the first dentry, and it isn't appropriate
|
||||
* to move it to the head of the list, so give up, and try
|
||||
* later
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Insert dentry at the head of the list as inserting at the
|
||||
* tail leads to a cycle.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
break;
|
||||
list_add(&dentry->d_lru, &dentry_unused);
|
||||
dentry_stat.nr_unused++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue