sunrpc/cache: use list_del_init for the list_head entries in cache_deferred_req

Using list_del_init is generally safer than list_del, and it will
allow us, in a subsequent patch, to see if an entry has already been
processed or not.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
This commit is contained in:
NeilBrown 2009-09-09 16:32:54 +10:00 committed by J. Bruce Fields
parent c0826574dd
commit 67e7328f15

View file

@ -529,8 +529,8 @@ static int cache_defer_req(struct cache_req *req, struct cache_head *item)
if (++cache_defer_cnt > DFR_MAX) {
dreq = list_entry(cache_defer_list.prev,
struct cache_deferred_req, recent);
list_del(&dreq->recent);
list_del(&dreq->hash);
list_del_init(&dreq->recent);
list_del_init(&dreq->hash);
cache_defer_cnt--;
}
spin_unlock(&cache_defer_lock);
@ -564,7 +564,7 @@ static void cache_revisit_request(struct cache_head *item)
dreq = list_entry(lp, struct cache_deferred_req, hash);
lp = lp->next;
if (dreq->item == item) {
list_del(&dreq->hash);
list_del_init(&dreq->hash);
list_move(&dreq->recent, &pending);
cache_defer_cnt--;
}
@ -590,7 +590,7 @@ void cache_clean_deferred(void *owner)
list_for_each_entry_safe(dreq, tmp, &cache_defer_list, recent) {
if (dreq->owner == owner) {
list_del(&dreq->hash);
list_del_init(&dreq->hash);
list_move(&dreq->recent, &pending);
cache_defer_cnt--;
}