mirror of
https://github.com/adulau/aha.git
synced 2024-12-28 03:36:19 +00:00
x86: add CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR self-test
This patch adds a simple self-test capability to the stackprotector feature. The test deliberately overflows a stack buffer and then checks if the canary trap function gets called. Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
113c5413cf
commit
54371a43a6
1 changed files with 68 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -324,14 +324,82 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(warn_on_slowpath);
|
|||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR
|
||||
|
||||
static unsigned long __stack_check_testing;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Self test function for the stack-protector feature.
|
||||
* This test requires that the local variable absolutely has
|
||||
* a stack slot, hence the barrier()s.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static noinline void __stack_chk_test_func(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned long foo;
|
||||
barrier();
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* we need to make sure we're not about to clobber the return address,
|
||||
* while real exploits do this, it's unhealthy on a running system.
|
||||
* Besides, if we would, the test is already failed anyway so
|
||||
* time to pull the emergency brake on it.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if ((unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(0) ==
|
||||
*(((unsigned long *)&foo)+1)) {
|
||||
printk(KERN_ERR "No -fstack-protector-stack-frame!\n");
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
|
||||
/* We also don't want to clobber the frame pointer */
|
||||
if ((unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(0) ==
|
||||
*(((unsigned long *)&foo)+2)) {
|
||||
printk(KERN_ERR "No -fstack-protector-stack-frame!\n");
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
barrier();
|
||||
if (current->stack_canary == *(((unsigned long *)&foo)+1))
|
||||
*(((unsigned long *)&foo)+1) = 0;
|
||||
else
|
||||
printk(KERN_ERR "No -fstack-protector canary found\n");
|
||||
barrier();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int __stack_chk_test(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
printk(KERN_INFO "Testing -fstack-protector-all feature\n");
|
||||
__stack_check_testing = (unsigned long)&__stack_chk_test_func;
|
||||
__stack_chk_test_func();
|
||||
if (__stack_check_testing) {
|
||||
printk(KERN_ERR "-fstack-protector-all test failed\n");
|
||||
WARN_ON(1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Called when gcc's -fstack-protector feature is used, and
|
||||
* gcc detects corruption of the on-stack canary value
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void __stack_chk_fail(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (__stack_check_testing == (unsigned long)&__stack_chk_test_func) {
|
||||
long delta;
|
||||
|
||||
delta = (unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(0) -
|
||||
__stack_check_testing;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The test needs to happen inside the test function, so
|
||||
* check if the return address is close to that function.
|
||||
* The function is only 2 dozen bytes long, but keep a wide
|
||||
* safety margin to avoid panic()s for normal users regardless
|
||||
* of the quality of the compiler.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (delta >= 0 && delta <= 400) {
|
||||
__stack_check_testing = 0;
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
panic("stack-protector: Kernel stack is corrupted in: %p\n",
|
||||
__builtin_return_address(0));
|
||||
}
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__stack_chk_fail);
|
||||
|
||||
late_initcall(__stack_chk_test);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue