From 4ffc84442572669727dc4fcd976582508eaf23e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 03:07:44 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [PATCH] Move cond_resched() after iput() in sync_sb_inodes()

In here, I think the following order is more cache-friendly.

Signed-off-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
---
 fs/fs-writeback.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
index 785c7213a54..f3fbe2d030f 100644
--- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ sync_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb, struct writeback_control *wbc)
 			list_move(&inode->i_list, &sb->s_dirty);
 		}
 		spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
-		cond_resched();
 		iput(inode);
+		cond_resched();
 		spin_lock(&inode_lock);
 		if (wbc->nr_to_write <= 0)
 			break;