ath9k: Fix chainmask selection during scanning

The TX/RX chainmasks were set to 1x1 during scanning.
Configure them properly with the values retrieved from
the EEPROM.

Also, this requires scan_start/scan_end callbacks to be
locked with sc->mutex.

Signed-off-by: Sujith <Sujith.Manoharan@atheros.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
This commit is contained in:
Sujith 2009-08-21 12:00:28 +05:30 committed by John W. Linville
parent 103bf9f7d3
commit 3d832611d7

View file

@ -439,7 +439,7 @@ static void ath_start_ani(struct ath_softc *sc)
*/
void ath_update_chainmask(struct ath_softc *sc, int is_ht)
{
if (is_ht ||
if ((sc->sc_flags & SC_OP_SCANNING) || is_ht ||
(sc->sc_ah->caps.hw_caps & ATH9K_HW_CAP_BT_COEX)) {
sc->tx_chainmask = sc->sc_ah->caps.tx_chainmask;
sc->rx_chainmask = sc->sc_ah->caps.rx_chainmask;
@ -2713,6 +2713,7 @@ static void ath9k_sw_scan_start(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
struct ath_wiphy *aphy = hw->priv;
struct ath_softc *sc = aphy->sc;
mutex_lock(&sc->mutex);
if (ath9k_wiphy_scanning(sc)) {
printk(KERN_DEBUG "ath9k: Two wiphys trying to scan at the "
"same time\n");
@ -2720,6 +2721,7 @@ static void ath9k_sw_scan_start(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
* Do not allow the concurrent scanning state for now. This
* could be improved with scanning control moved into ath9k.
*/
mutex_unlock(&sc->mutex);
return;
}
@ -2729,6 +2731,7 @@ static void ath9k_sw_scan_start(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
spin_lock_bh(&sc->ani_lock);
sc->sc_flags |= SC_OP_SCANNING;
spin_unlock_bh(&sc->ani_lock);
mutex_unlock(&sc->mutex);
}
static void ath9k_sw_scan_complete(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
@ -2736,11 +2739,13 @@ static void ath9k_sw_scan_complete(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
struct ath_wiphy *aphy = hw->priv;
struct ath_softc *sc = aphy->sc;
mutex_lock(&sc->mutex);
spin_lock_bh(&sc->ani_lock);
aphy->state = ATH_WIPHY_ACTIVE;
sc->sc_flags &= ~SC_OP_SCANNING;
sc->sc_flags |= SC_OP_FULL_RESET;
spin_unlock_bh(&sc->ani_lock);
mutex_unlock(&sc->mutex);
}
struct ieee80211_ops ath9k_ops = {