mirror of
https://github.com/adulau/aha.git
synced 2024-12-27 11:16:11 +00:00
perf_counter: Fix a race on perf_counter_ctx
While extending perfcounters with BTS hw-tracing, Markus
Metzger managed to trigger this warning:
[ 995.557128] WARNING: at kernel/perf_counter.c:1191 __perf_counter_task_sched_out+0x48/0x6b()
triggers because commit
9f498cc5be
(perf_counter: Full
task tracing) removed clearing of tsk->perf_counter_ctxp out
from under ctx->lock which introduced a race (against
perf_lock_task_context).
Move it back and deal with the exit notification by explicitly
passing along the former task context.
Reported-by: Markus T Metzger <markus.t.metzger@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
LKML-Reference: <1249667341.17467.5.camel@twins>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
parent
3a43ce68ae
commit
3a80b4a353
1 changed files with 15 additions and 15 deletions
|
@ -2850,7 +2850,8 @@ perf_counter_read_event(struct perf_counter *counter,
|
|||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
struct perf_task_event {
|
||||
struct task_struct *task;
|
||||
struct task_struct *task;
|
||||
struct perf_counter_context *task_ctx;
|
||||
|
||||
struct {
|
||||
struct perf_event_header header;
|
||||
|
@ -2910,24 +2911,23 @@ static void perf_counter_task_ctx(struct perf_counter_context *ctx,
|
|||
static void perf_counter_task_event(struct perf_task_event *task_event)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx;
|
||||
struct perf_counter_context *ctx;
|
||||
struct perf_counter_context *ctx = task_event->task_ctx;
|
||||
|
||||
cpuctx = &get_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context);
|
||||
perf_counter_task_ctx(&cpuctx->ctx, task_event);
|
||||
put_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context);
|
||||
|
||||
rcu_read_lock();
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* doesn't really matter which of the child contexts the
|
||||
* events ends up in.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
ctx = rcu_dereference(current->perf_counter_ctxp);
|
||||
if (!ctx)
|
||||
ctx = rcu_dereference(task_event->task->perf_counter_ctxp);
|
||||
if (ctx)
|
||||
perf_counter_task_ctx(ctx, task_event);
|
||||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void perf_counter_task(struct task_struct *task, int new)
|
||||
static void perf_counter_task(struct task_struct *task,
|
||||
struct perf_counter_context *task_ctx,
|
||||
int new)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct perf_task_event task_event;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -2937,8 +2937,9 @@ static void perf_counter_task(struct task_struct *task, int new)
|
|||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
task_event = (struct perf_task_event){
|
||||
.task = task,
|
||||
.event = {
|
||||
.task = task,
|
||||
.task_ctx = task_ctx,
|
||||
.event = {
|
||||
.header = {
|
||||
.type = new ? PERF_EVENT_FORK : PERF_EVENT_EXIT,
|
||||
.misc = 0,
|
||||
|
@ -2956,7 +2957,7 @@ static void perf_counter_task(struct task_struct *task, int new)
|
|||
|
||||
void perf_counter_fork(struct task_struct *task)
|
||||
{
|
||||
perf_counter_task(task, 1);
|
||||
perf_counter_task(task, NULL, 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
@ -4310,7 +4311,7 @@ void perf_counter_exit_task(struct task_struct *child)
|
|||
unsigned long flags;
|
||||
|
||||
if (likely(!child->perf_counter_ctxp)) {
|
||||
perf_counter_task(child, 0);
|
||||
perf_counter_task(child, NULL, 0);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -4330,6 +4331,7 @@ void perf_counter_exit_task(struct task_struct *child)
|
|||
* incremented the context's refcount before we do put_ctx below.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
spin_lock(&child_ctx->lock);
|
||||
child->perf_counter_ctxp = NULL;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If this context is a clone; unclone it so it can't get
|
||||
* swapped to another process while we're removing all
|
||||
|
@ -4343,9 +4345,7 @@ void perf_counter_exit_task(struct task_struct *child)
|
|||
* won't get any samples after PERF_EVENT_EXIT. We can however still
|
||||
* get a few PERF_EVENT_READ events.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
perf_counter_task(child, 0);
|
||||
|
||||
child->perf_counter_ctxp = NULL;
|
||||
perf_counter_task(child, child_ctx, 0);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We can recurse on the same lock type through:
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue