From 2e2ba22ea4fd4bb85f0fa37c521066db6775cbef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Oleg Nesterov Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:53:01 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] signals: check_kill_permission: check session under tasklist_lock This wasn't documented, but as Atsushi Tsuji pointed out check_kill_permission() needs tasklist_lock for task_session_nr(). I missed this fact when removed tasklist from the callers. Change check_kill_permission() to take tasklist_lock for the SIGCONT case. Re-order security checks so that we take tasklist_lock only if/when it is actually needed. This is a minimal fix for now, tasklist will be removed later. Also change the code to use task_session() instead of task_session_nr(). Also, remove the SIGCONT check from cap_task_kill(), it is bogus (and the whole function is bogus. Serge, Eric, why it is still alive?). Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov Acked-by: Atsushi Tsuji Cc: Roland McGrath Cc: Serge Hallyn Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- kernel/signal.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c index 251cc13720b..24be82c0aae 100644 --- a/kernel/signal.c +++ b/kernel/signal.c @@ -533,6 +533,7 @@ static int rm_from_queue(unsigned long mask, struct sigpending *s) static int check_kill_permission(int sig, struct siginfo *info, struct task_struct *t) { + struct pid *sid; int error; if (!valid_signal(sig)) @@ -545,11 +546,24 @@ static int check_kill_permission(int sig, struct siginfo *info, if (error) return error; - if (((sig != SIGCONT) || (task_session_nr(current) != task_session_nr(t))) - && (current->euid ^ t->suid) && (current->euid ^ t->uid) - && (current->uid ^ t->suid) && (current->uid ^ t->uid) - && !capable(CAP_KILL)) - return -EPERM; + if ((current->euid ^ t->suid) && (current->euid ^ t->uid) && + (current->uid ^ t->suid) && (current->uid ^ t->uid) && + !capable(CAP_KILL)) { + switch (sig) { + case SIGCONT: + read_lock(&tasklist_lock); + sid = task_session(t); + read_unlock(&tasklist_lock); + /* + * We don't return the error if sid == NULL. The + * task was unhashed, the caller must notice this. + */ + if (!sid || sid == task_session(current)) + break; + default: + return -EPERM; + } + } return security_task_kill(t, info, sig, 0); }