mirror of
https://github.com/adulau/aha.git
synced 2024-12-28 03:36:19 +00:00
KVM: Add MSI-X interrupt injection logic
We have to handle more than one interrupt with one handler for MSI-X. Avi suggested to use a flag to indicate the pending. So here is it. Signed-off-by: Sheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c1e0151429
commit
2350bd1f62
2 changed files with 60 additions and 7 deletions
|
@ -319,6 +319,7 @@ struct kvm_irq_ack_notifier {
|
|||
void (*irq_acked)(struct kvm_irq_ack_notifier *kian);
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
#define KVM_ASSIGNED_MSIX_PENDING 0x1
|
||||
struct kvm_guest_msix_entry {
|
||||
u32 vector;
|
||||
u16 entry;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -95,25 +95,69 @@ static struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel *kvm_find_assigned_dev(struct list_head *h
|
|||
return NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int find_index_from_host_irq(struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel
|
||||
*assigned_dev, int irq)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int i, index;
|
||||
struct msix_entry *host_msix_entries;
|
||||
|
||||
host_msix_entries = assigned_dev->host_msix_entries;
|
||||
|
||||
index = -1;
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < assigned_dev->entries_nr; i++)
|
||||
if (irq == host_msix_entries[i].vector) {
|
||||
index = i;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (index < 0) {
|
||||
printk(KERN_WARNING "Fail to find correlated MSI-X entry!\n");
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return index;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void kvm_assigned_dev_interrupt_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel *assigned_dev;
|
||||
struct kvm *kvm;
|
||||
int irq, i;
|
||||
|
||||
assigned_dev = container_of(work, struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel,
|
||||
interrupt_work);
|
||||
kvm = assigned_dev->kvm;
|
||||
|
||||
/* This is taken to safely inject irq inside the guest. When
|
||||
* the interrupt injection (or the ioapic code) uses a
|
||||
* finer-grained lock, update this
|
||||
*/
|
||||
mutex_lock(&assigned_dev->kvm->lock);
|
||||
kvm_set_irq(assigned_dev->kvm, assigned_dev->irq_source_id,
|
||||
assigned_dev->guest_irq, 1);
|
||||
|
||||
if (assigned_dev->irq_requested_type & KVM_ASSIGNED_DEV_GUEST_MSI) {
|
||||
enable_irq(assigned_dev->host_irq);
|
||||
assigned_dev->host_irq_disabled = false;
|
||||
mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
|
||||
if (assigned_dev->irq_requested_type & KVM_ASSIGNED_DEV_MSIX) {
|
||||
struct kvm_guest_msix_entry *guest_entries =
|
||||
assigned_dev->guest_msix_entries;
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < assigned_dev->entries_nr; i++) {
|
||||
if (!(guest_entries[i].flags &
|
||||
KVM_ASSIGNED_MSIX_PENDING))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
guest_entries[i].flags &= ~KVM_ASSIGNED_MSIX_PENDING;
|
||||
kvm_set_irq(assigned_dev->kvm,
|
||||
assigned_dev->irq_source_id,
|
||||
guest_entries[i].vector, 1);
|
||||
irq = assigned_dev->host_msix_entries[i].vector;
|
||||
if (irq != 0)
|
||||
enable_irq(irq);
|
||||
assigned_dev->host_irq_disabled = false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
kvm_set_irq(assigned_dev->kvm, assigned_dev->irq_source_id,
|
||||
assigned_dev->guest_irq, 1);
|
||||
if (assigned_dev->irq_requested_type &
|
||||
KVM_ASSIGNED_DEV_GUEST_MSI) {
|
||||
enable_irq(assigned_dev->host_irq);
|
||||
assigned_dev->host_irq_disabled = false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&assigned_dev->kvm->lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -122,6 +166,14 @@ static irqreturn_t kvm_assigned_dev_intr(int irq, void *dev_id)
|
|||
struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel *assigned_dev =
|
||||
(struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel *) dev_id;
|
||||
|
||||
if (assigned_dev->irq_requested_type == KVM_ASSIGNED_DEV_MSIX) {
|
||||
int index = find_index_from_host_irq(assigned_dev, irq);
|
||||
if (index < 0)
|
||||
return IRQ_HANDLED;
|
||||
assigned_dev->guest_msix_entries[index].flags |=
|
||||
KVM_ASSIGNED_MSIX_PENDING;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
schedule_work(&assigned_dev->interrupt_work);
|
||||
|
||||
disable_irq_nosync(irq);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue