mirror of
https://github.com/adulau/aha.git
synced 2024-12-28 03:36:19 +00:00
ptrace_stop: fix racy nonstop_code setting
If the tracer is gone and we are not going to stop, ptrace_stop() sets ->exit_code = nostop_code. However, the tracer could actually clear the exit code before detaching. In that case get_signal_to_deliver() "resends" the signal which was cancelled by the debugger. For example, it is possible that a quick PTRACE_ATTACH + PTRACE_DETACH can leave the tracee in STOPPED state. Change the behaviour of ptrace_stop(). If the caller is ptrace notify(), we should always clear ->exit_code. If the caller is get_signal_to_deliver(), we should not touch it at all. To do so, change the nonstop_code parameter to "bool clear_code" and change the callers accordingly. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru> Acked-by: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
9cbab81005
commit
20686a309a
1 changed files with 7 additions and 6 deletions
|
@ -1591,10 +1591,10 @@ static int sigkill_pending(struct task_struct *tsk)
|
|||
* That makes it a way to test a stopped process for
|
||||
* being ptrace-stopped vs being job-control-stopped.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* If we actually decide not to stop at all because the tracer is gone,
|
||||
* we leave nostop_code in current->exit_code.
|
||||
* If we actually decide not to stop at all because the tracer
|
||||
* is gone, we keep current->exit_code unless clear_code.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void ptrace_stop(int exit_code, int nostop_code, siginfo_t *info)
|
||||
static void ptrace_stop(int exit_code, int clear_code, siginfo_t *info)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int killed = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1641,7 +1641,8 @@ static void ptrace_stop(int exit_code, int nostop_code, siginfo_t *info)
|
|||
* Don't drop the lock yet, another tracer may come.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
|
||||
current->exit_code = nostop_code;
|
||||
if (clear_code)
|
||||
current->exit_code = 0;
|
||||
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1675,7 +1676,7 @@ void ptrace_notify(int exit_code)
|
|||
|
||||
/* Let the debugger run. */
|
||||
spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
|
||||
ptrace_stop(exit_code, 0, &info);
|
||||
ptrace_stop(exit_code, 1, &info);
|
||||
spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1782,7 +1783,7 @@ relock:
|
|||
ptrace_signal_deliver(regs, cookie);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Let the debugger run. */
|
||||
ptrace_stop(signr, signr, info);
|
||||
ptrace_stop(signr, 0, info);
|
||||
|
||||
/* We're back. Did the debugger cancel the sig? */
|
||||
signr = current->exit_code;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue