[X25]: use LIST_HEAD instead of LIST_HEAD_INIT

single list_head variable initialized with LIST_HEAD_INIT could almost
always can be replaced with LIST_HEAD declaration, this shrinks the code
and looks better.

Signed-off-by: Denis Cheng <crquan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
Denis Cheng 2007-12-07 00:50:43 -08:00 committed by David S. Miller
parent 14d0e7b74e
commit 0e3cf7e916
3 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions

View file

@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <net/x25.h>
struct list_head x25_forward_list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(x25_forward_list);
LIST_HEAD(x25_forward_list);
DEFINE_RWLOCK(x25_forward_list_lock);
int x25_forward_call(struct x25_address *dest_addr, struct x25_neigh *from,

View file

@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <net/x25.h>
static struct list_head x25_neigh_list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(x25_neigh_list);
static LIST_HEAD(x25_neigh_list);
static DEFINE_RWLOCK(x25_neigh_list_lock);
static void x25_t20timer_expiry(unsigned long);

View file

@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <net/x25.h>
struct list_head x25_route_list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(x25_route_list);
LIST_HEAD(x25_route_list);
DEFINE_RWLOCK(x25_route_list_lock);
/*