aha/kernel/sched_rt.c

247 lines
5.8 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* Real-Time Scheduling Class (mapped to the SCHED_FIFO and SCHED_RR
* policies)
*/
/*
* Update the current task's runtime statistics. Skip current tasks that
* are not in our scheduling class.
*/
static inline void update_curr_rt(struct rq *rq, u64 now)
{
struct task_struct *curr = rq->curr;
u64 delta_exec;
if (!task_has_rt_policy(curr))
return;
delta_exec = now - curr->se.exec_start;
if (unlikely((s64)delta_exec < 0))
delta_exec = 0;
schedstat_set(curr->se.exec_max, max(curr->se.exec_max, delta_exec));
curr->se.sum_exec_runtime += delta_exec;
curr->se.exec_start = now;
}
static void
enqueue_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wakeup, u64 now)
{
struct rt_prio_array *array = &rq->rt.active;
list_add_tail(&p->run_list, array->queue + p->prio);
__set_bit(p->prio, array->bitmap);
}
/*
* Adding/removing a task to/from a priority array:
*/
static void
dequeue_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sleep, u64 now)
{
struct rt_prio_array *array = &rq->rt.active;
update_curr_rt(rq, now);
list_del(&p->run_list);
if (list_empty(array->queue + p->prio))
__clear_bit(p->prio, array->bitmap);
}
/*
* Put task to the end of the run list without the overhead of dequeue
* followed by enqueue.
*/
static void requeue_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
{
struct rt_prio_array *array = &rq->rt.active;
list_move_tail(&p->run_list, array->queue + p->prio);
}
static void
yield_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
{
requeue_task_rt(rq, p);
}
/*
* Preempt the current task with a newly woken task if needed:
*/
static void check_preempt_curr_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
{
if (p->prio < rq->curr->prio)
resched_task(rq->curr);
}
static struct task_struct *pick_next_task_rt(struct rq *rq, u64 now)
{
struct rt_prio_array *array = &rq->rt.active;
struct task_struct *next;
struct list_head *queue;
int idx;
idx = sched_find_first_bit(array->bitmap);
if (idx >= MAX_RT_PRIO)
return NULL;
queue = array->queue + idx;
next = list_entry(queue->next, struct task_struct, run_list);
next->se.exec_start = now;
return next;
}
static void put_prev_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, u64 now)
{
update_curr_rt(rq, now);
p->se.exec_start = 0;
}
/*
* Load-balancing iterator. Note: while the runqueue stays locked
* during the whole iteration, the current task might be
* dequeued so the iterator has to be dequeue-safe. Here we
* achieve that by always pre-iterating before returning
* the current task:
*/
static struct task_struct *load_balance_start_rt(void *arg)
{
struct rq *rq = arg;
struct rt_prio_array *array = &rq->rt.active;
struct list_head *head, *curr;
struct task_struct *p;
int idx;
idx = sched_find_first_bit(array->bitmap);
if (idx >= MAX_RT_PRIO)
return NULL;
head = array->queue + idx;
curr = head->prev;
p = list_entry(curr, struct task_struct, run_list);
curr = curr->prev;
rq->rt.rt_load_balance_idx = idx;
rq->rt.rt_load_balance_head = head;
rq->rt.rt_load_balance_curr = curr;
return p;
}
static struct task_struct *load_balance_next_rt(void *arg)
{
struct rq *rq = arg;
struct rt_prio_array *array = &rq->rt.active;
struct list_head *head, *curr;
struct task_struct *p;
int idx;
idx = rq->rt.rt_load_balance_idx;
head = rq->rt.rt_load_balance_head;
curr = rq->rt.rt_load_balance_curr;
/*
* If we arrived back to the head again then
* iterate to the next queue (if any):
*/
if (unlikely(head == curr)) {
int next_idx = find_next_bit(array->bitmap, MAX_RT_PRIO, idx+1);
if (next_idx >= MAX_RT_PRIO)
return NULL;
idx = next_idx;
head = array->queue + idx;
curr = head->prev;
rq->rt.rt_load_balance_idx = idx;
rq->rt.rt_load_balance_head = head;
}
p = list_entry(curr, struct task_struct, run_list);
curr = curr->prev;
rq->rt.rt_load_balance_curr = curr;
return p;
}
sched: simplify move_tasks() The move_tasks() function is currently multiplexed with two distinct capabilities: 1. attempt to move a specified amount of weighted load from one run queue to another; and 2. attempt to move a specified number of tasks from one run queue to another. The first of these capabilities is used in two places, load_balance() and load_balance_idle(), and in both of these cases the return value of move_tasks() is used purely to decide if tasks/load were moved and no notice of the actual number of tasks moved is taken. The second capability is used in exactly one place, active_load_balance(), to attempt to move exactly one task and, as before, the return value is only used as an indicator of success or failure. This multiplexing of sched_task() was introduced, by me, as part of the smpnice patches and was motivated by the fact that the alternative, one function to move specified load and one to move a single task, would have led to two functions of roughly the same complexity as the old move_tasks() (or the new balance_tasks()). However, the new modular design of the new CFS scheduler allows a simpler solution to be adopted and this patch addresses that solution by: 1. adding a new function, move_one_task(), to be used by active_load_balance(); and 2. making move_tasks() a single purpose function that tries to move a specified weighted load and returns 1 for success and 0 for failure. One of the consequences of these changes is that neither move_one_task() or the new move_tasks() care how many tasks sched_class.load_balance() moves and this enables its interface to be simplified by returning the amount of load moved as its result and removing the load_moved pointer from the argument list. This helps simplify the new move_tasks() and slightly reduces the amount of work done in each of sched_class.load_balance()'s implementations. Further simplification, e.g. changes to balance_tasks(), are possible but (slightly) complicated by the special needs of load_balance_fair() so I've left them to a later patch (if this one gets accepted). NB Since move_tasks() gets called with two run queue locks held even small reductions in overhead are worthwhile. [ mingo@elte.hu ] this change also reduces code size nicely: text data bss dec hex filename 39216 3618 24 42858 a76a sched.o.before 39173 3618 24 42815 a73f sched.o.after Signed-off-by: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2007-08-09 09:16:46 +00:00
static unsigned long
load_balance_rt(struct rq *this_rq, int this_cpu, struct rq *busiest,
unsigned long max_nr_move, unsigned long max_load_move,
struct sched_domain *sd, enum cpu_idle_type idle,
sched: simplify move_tasks() The move_tasks() function is currently multiplexed with two distinct capabilities: 1. attempt to move a specified amount of weighted load from one run queue to another; and 2. attempt to move a specified number of tasks from one run queue to another. The first of these capabilities is used in two places, load_balance() and load_balance_idle(), and in both of these cases the return value of move_tasks() is used purely to decide if tasks/load were moved and no notice of the actual number of tasks moved is taken. The second capability is used in exactly one place, active_load_balance(), to attempt to move exactly one task and, as before, the return value is only used as an indicator of success or failure. This multiplexing of sched_task() was introduced, by me, as part of the smpnice patches and was motivated by the fact that the alternative, one function to move specified load and one to move a single task, would have led to two functions of roughly the same complexity as the old move_tasks() (or the new balance_tasks()). However, the new modular design of the new CFS scheduler allows a simpler solution to be adopted and this patch addresses that solution by: 1. adding a new function, move_one_task(), to be used by active_load_balance(); and 2. making move_tasks() a single purpose function that tries to move a specified weighted load and returns 1 for success and 0 for failure. One of the consequences of these changes is that neither move_one_task() or the new move_tasks() care how many tasks sched_class.load_balance() moves and this enables its interface to be simplified by returning the amount of load moved as its result and removing the load_moved pointer from the argument list. This helps simplify the new move_tasks() and slightly reduces the amount of work done in each of sched_class.load_balance()'s implementations. Further simplification, e.g. changes to balance_tasks(), are possible but (slightly) complicated by the special needs of load_balance_fair() so I've left them to a later patch (if this one gets accepted). NB Since move_tasks() gets called with two run queue locks held even small reductions in overhead are worthwhile. [ mingo@elte.hu ] this change also reduces code size nicely: text data bss dec hex filename 39216 3618 24 42858 a76a sched.o.before 39173 3618 24 42815 a73f sched.o.after Signed-off-by: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2007-08-09 09:16:46 +00:00
int *all_pinned)
{
int this_best_prio, best_prio, best_prio_seen = 0;
int nr_moved;
struct rq_iterator rt_rq_iterator;
sched: simplify move_tasks() The move_tasks() function is currently multiplexed with two distinct capabilities: 1. attempt to move a specified amount of weighted load from one run queue to another; and 2. attempt to move a specified number of tasks from one run queue to another. The first of these capabilities is used in two places, load_balance() and load_balance_idle(), and in both of these cases the return value of move_tasks() is used purely to decide if tasks/load were moved and no notice of the actual number of tasks moved is taken. The second capability is used in exactly one place, active_load_balance(), to attempt to move exactly one task and, as before, the return value is only used as an indicator of success or failure. This multiplexing of sched_task() was introduced, by me, as part of the smpnice patches and was motivated by the fact that the alternative, one function to move specified load and one to move a single task, would have led to two functions of roughly the same complexity as the old move_tasks() (or the new balance_tasks()). However, the new modular design of the new CFS scheduler allows a simpler solution to be adopted and this patch addresses that solution by: 1. adding a new function, move_one_task(), to be used by active_load_balance(); and 2. making move_tasks() a single purpose function that tries to move a specified weighted load and returns 1 for success and 0 for failure. One of the consequences of these changes is that neither move_one_task() or the new move_tasks() care how many tasks sched_class.load_balance() moves and this enables its interface to be simplified by returning the amount of load moved as its result and removing the load_moved pointer from the argument list. This helps simplify the new move_tasks() and slightly reduces the amount of work done in each of sched_class.load_balance()'s implementations. Further simplification, e.g. changes to balance_tasks(), are possible but (slightly) complicated by the special needs of load_balance_fair() so I've left them to a later patch (if this one gets accepted). NB Since move_tasks() gets called with two run queue locks held even small reductions in overhead are worthwhile. [ mingo@elte.hu ] this change also reduces code size nicely: text data bss dec hex filename 39216 3618 24 42858 a76a sched.o.before 39173 3618 24 42815 a73f sched.o.after Signed-off-by: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2007-08-09 09:16:46 +00:00
unsigned long load_moved;
best_prio = sched_find_first_bit(busiest->rt.active.bitmap);
this_best_prio = sched_find_first_bit(this_rq->rt.active.bitmap);
/*
* Enable handling of the case where there is more than one task
* with the best priority. If the current running task is one
* of those with prio==best_prio we know it won't be moved
* and therefore it's safe to override the skip (based on load)
* of any task we find with that prio.
*/
if (busiest->curr->prio == best_prio)
best_prio_seen = 1;
rt_rq_iterator.start = load_balance_start_rt;
rt_rq_iterator.next = load_balance_next_rt;
/* pass 'busiest' rq argument into
* load_balance_[start|next]_rt iterators
*/
rt_rq_iterator.arg = busiest;
nr_moved = balance_tasks(this_rq, this_cpu, busiest, max_nr_move,
sched: simplify move_tasks() The move_tasks() function is currently multiplexed with two distinct capabilities: 1. attempt to move a specified amount of weighted load from one run queue to another; and 2. attempt to move a specified number of tasks from one run queue to another. The first of these capabilities is used in two places, load_balance() and load_balance_idle(), and in both of these cases the return value of move_tasks() is used purely to decide if tasks/load were moved and no notice of the actual number of tasks moved is taken. The second capability is used in exactly one place, active_load_balance(), to attempt to move exactly one task and, as before, the return value is only used as an indicator of success or failure. This multiplexing of sched_task() was introduced, by me, as part of the smpnice patches and was motivated by the fact that the alternative, one function to move specified load and one to move a single task, would have led to two functions of roughly the same complexity as the old move_tasks() (or the new balance_tasks()). However, the new modular design of the new CFS scheduler allows a simpler solution to be adopted and this patch addresses that solution by: 1. adding a new function, move_one_task(), to be used by active_load_balance(); and 2. making move_tasks() a single purpose function that tries to move a specified weighted load and returns 1 for success and 0 for failure. One of the consequences of these changes is that neither move_one_task() or the new move_tasks() care how many tasks sched_class.load_balance() moves and this enables its interface to be simplified by returning the amount of load moved as its result and removing the load_moved pointer from the argument list. This helps simplify the new move_tasks() and slightly reduces the amount of work done in each of sched_class.load_balance()'s implementations. Further simplification, e.g. changes to balance_tasks(), are possible but (slightly) complicated by the special needs of load_balance_fair() so I've left them to a later patch (if this one gets accepted). NB Since move_tasks() gets called with two run queue locks held even small reductions in overhead are worthwhile. [ mingo@elte.hu ] this change also reduces code size nicely: text data bss dec hex filename 39216 3618 24 42858 a76a sched.o.before 39173 3618 24 42815 a73f sched.o.after Signed-off-by: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2007-08-09 09:16:46 +00:00
max_load_move, sd, idle, all_pinned, &load_moved,
this_best_prio, best_prio, best_prio_seen,
&rt_rq_iterator);
sched: simplify move_tasks() The move_tasks() function is currently multiplexed with two distinct capabilities: 1. attempt to move a specified amount of weighted load from one run queue to another; and 2. attempt to move a specified number of tasks from one run queue to another. The first of these capabilities is used in two places, load_balance() and load_balance_idle(), and in both of these cases the return value of move_tasks() is used purely to decide if tasks/load were moved and no notice of the actual number of tasks moved is taken. The second capability is used in exactly one place, active_load_balance(), to attempt to move exactly one task and, as before, the return value is only used as an indicator of success or failure. This multiplexing of sched_task() was introduced, by me, as part of the smpnice patches and was motivated by the fact that the alternative, one function to move specified load and one to move a single task, would have led to two functions of roughly the same complexity as the old move_tasks() (or the new balance_tasks()). However, the new modular design of the new CFS scheduler allows a simpler solution to be adopted and this patch addresses that solution by: 1. adding a new function, move_one_task(), to be used by active_load_balance(); and 2. making move_tasks() a single purpose function that tries to move a specified weighted load and returns 1 for success and 0 for failure. One of the consequences of these changes is that neither move_one_task() or the new move_tasks() care how many tasks sched_class.load_balance() moves and this enables its interface to be simplified by returning the amount of load moved as its result and removing the load_moved pointer from the argument list. This helps simplify the new move_tasks() and slightly reduces the amount of work done in each of sched_class.load_balance()'s implementations. Further simplification, e.g. changes to balance_tasks(), are possible but (slightly) complicated by the special needs of load_balance_fair() so I've left them to a later patch (if this one gets accepted). NB Since move_tasks() gets called with two run queue locks held even small reductions in overhead are worthwhile. [ mingo@elte.hu ] this change also reduces code size nicely: text data bss dec hex filename 39216 3618 24 42858 a76a sched.o.before 39173 3618 24 42815 a73f sched.o.after Signed-off-by: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2007-08-09 09:16:46 +00:00
return load_moved;
}
static void task_tick_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
{
/*
* RR tasks need a special form of timeslice management.
* FIFO tasks have no timeslices.
*/
if (p->policy != SCHED_RR)
return;
if (--p->time_slice)
return;
p->time_slice = static_prio_timeslice(p->static_prio);
set_tsk_need_resched(p);
/* put it at the end of the queue: */
requeue_task_rt(rq, p);
}
static struct sched_class rt_sched_class __read_mostly = {
.enqueue_task = enqueue_task_rt,
.dequeue_task = dequeue_task_rt,
.yield_task = yield_task_rt,
.check_preempt_curr = check_preempt_curr_rt,
.pick_next_task = pick_next_task_rt,
.put_prev_task = put_prev_task_rt,
.load_balance = load_balance_rt,
.task_tick = task_tick_rt,
};